Showing posts with label Comets. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Comets. Show all posts

Camelopardalids, dust up to dust

In November 2013, Quanzhi Ye and Paul A. Wiegert submitted a paper to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society suggesting that Comet 209P/LINEAR might produce strong meteor activity on May 24, 2014. This prediction was based on numerical simulations of the Earth passing through comet's dust trails left behind from 1798-1979. Even though Comet 209P/LINEAR is relatively depleted in dust production, possibly transitioning from a typical comet to a dormant comet, the authors claimed their simulation showed that the size distribution of the arriving particles was skewed strongly to larger particles, and that the event, if detectable, may be dominated by bright meteors. The authors encouraged observers to monitor the event.

The headline read,  "May 2014 - Meteor Storm of the Century"
The popular press got wind of this and there was quite a "dust up", so to speak. After all, this was going to be the first ever 'meteor storm' arriving from this radiant in Camelopardalis, and it might put on a spectacular show with bright meteors and bolides. So everyone struggled to learn how to pronounce Camelopardalis and Camelopardalids and we all anxiously awaited the predicted peak of the meteor shower Saturday morning. 

Incredibly, the forecast for Michigan on the morning in question was for clear skies, so I set my alarm to get up around 1:30AM to go outside and witness the "meteor storm of the century". The alarm went off, I looked out the window and saw the sky was indeed clear, so I dragged myself out to the back yard, took a seat on a wet, dewy lawn chair and waited for the show to start.

And waited for the show to start.

And waited some more.

After forty minutes I had not seen one meteor, not even a random one. I was tired and having a hard time rationalizing staying awake in the midst of all this excitement and a wet butt, so I gave up and went back to bed. 

The following afternoon the IAU released Electronic Telegram No. 3886, in which they describe results from the Canadian Meteor Orbit Radar. They said that the radiant of the shower and peak of activity were very close to those predicted, suggesting that debris from comet 209P/LINEAR encountered the earth much as expected.  However, the shower radar echoes were confined to faint meteors (equivalent visual magnitude 6-7), which is consistent with a debris trail populated mainly by particles of milligram mass and smaller.

So the Camelopardalids Meteor Storm of the Century lived up to its namesake, Camelopardalis, one of the faintest constellations in the northern sky, with no stars brighter than 4th magnitude. Most people can't even point out Camelopardalis because it is invisible, even under semi-dark suburban skies. And, just like its namesake constellation, the Camelopardalids were mostly too faint to see, even from my rural dark sky sight.



A Comet Masquerading as an Asteroid

596 Scheila, the asteroid with a tail. Image credit: Peter Lake


When is an asteroid not an asteroid? When it turns out to be a comet, of course. Has this ever happened before? Why, yes it has. In fact it was just announced December 12, 2010 that the asteroid (596) Scheila has sprouted a tail and coma!

Steve Larson of the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory (LPL), University of Arizona first reported that images of the minor planet (596) Scheila taken on December 11th showed the object to be in outburst, with a comet-like appearance and an increase in brightness from magnitude 14.5 to 13.4. The cometary appearance of the object was confirmed be several other observers within hours.

A quick check of archived Catalina images of Scheila from October 18, November 2 and November 11 showed Sheila to look star-like, which is what asteroids look like from Earth. They just happen to be moving across the field of view in contrast to the fixed background stars. The image taken by Catalina on December 3rd shows some slight diffuseness and an increase in overall brightness. So, it appears this event began on or around December 3rd.

Upon hearing the news, there was some speculation that this might be evidence of an impact event. Had something crashed into asteroid Scheila? It seems unlikely, and this is a story we have heard before.

The asteroid discovered in 1979 and named 1979 OW7 was lost to astronomers for years and then recovered in 1996. It was subsequently renamed 1996 N2. That same year it was discovered to have a comet-like appearance, and many believed this was the signature of an impact between two asteroids. After years of inactivity 1996 N2 sprouted a tail again in 2002. One collision between two asteroids was unlikely enough. The odds of it happening again to the same object were essentially zero. What we had was a comet masquerading as an asteroid. This object is now known by its cometary name 133P/Elst-Pizarro, named after the two astronomers who discovered its initial cometary outburst.

The 2002 outburst and the discovery of more active asteroids showing mass-loss led to a paper (Hsieh and Jewitt 2006, Science, 312, 561-563) introducing an entirely new class of solar system objects, Main Belt Comets (MBC). MBCs look like comets because they show comae and have tails but they have orbits inside Jupiter's orbit like main belt asteroids.

The most likely cause of the mass loss activity in MBCs is sublimation of water ice as the surface of the MBC is heated by the Sun. This is suggested most strongly by the behavior of the best-studied example, namely 133P/Elst-Pizarro. Its activity is recurrent, and it is strongest near and after perihelion, the point in its orbit nearest the Sun, like other comets.

MBCs are interesting to astronomers because they appear to be a third reservoir of comets in our solar system, distinct from the Oort cloud and Kuiper belt. Since we know of no way for theses other reservoirs to have deposited comets in the inner solar system, the ice in MBCs probably has a different history than the ice in the outer comets. This allows researchers to study the differences in the Sun’s proto-planetary disk at three separate locations. This might lead to information on the Earth’s oceans, one of the continuing lines of investigation by solar system scientists.

Now it seems we have another MBC to add to the sample. And Scheila will probably be getting a new name soon. Asteroid (596) Scheila was discovered Feb. 21, 1906, by A. Kopff at Heidelberg. The 113Km in diameter ‘asteroid’ was named after an acquaintance, an English student at Heidelberg. In the future it will be called XXXP/Lawson or something similar, and Kopff’s Sheila will become just another footnote in the history of astronomical nomenclature.

The Stories Behind the August Perseids

It's August, so for better or worse, two stories will be making the rounds in the blogosphere. First, is the Mars Hoax email that will not die. I've written about this before, so we won't go there again. Second, is the Perseid meteor shower, which occurs every August.

The Perseids are my favorite meteor shower because the late summer weather is a lot easier to tolerate than some of the cold winter nights other annual showers happen to occur, like the Leonids in November and the Geminids in December.

Every August that the Moon promises not to interfere, we are reminded that this will be the best meteor shower of the year. But there is more to the Perseids than meets the eye and there are some interesting stories behind the Perseids that don't generally get told. I'd like to share some of them with you here.

Let's start with where do meteor showers come from?

We know today that there are streams of particles, called meteoroids, in orbit around the Sun. When the Earth encounters one of these streams, these mostly dust sized particles are trapped by Earth's gravity and burn up as they descend through the atmosphere. The result of this flame-out is a meteor, or what people commonly refer to as "a shooting star."

But where do these streams of meteoroids come from?

In the 1800's Giovanni Schiaparelli was the first to suggest that meteor showers were associated with periodic comets. Schiaparelli noted the orbits of some periodic comets coincided with the orbits of streams of particles responsible for meteor showers. One of these, Biela's comet, discovered in 1826, was identified by Austrian astronomer Wilhelm Baron von Biela as a periodic comet that returned every 6.6 years.

Biela's comet put on quite a show on subsequent returns after its discovery. It was seen to break apart into two pieces in 1846, and in 1852 the two fragments returned as twin comets! The remains were assumed to have disintegrated entirely since the comet was never seen again. In 1872 and 1885, however, when Earth crossed the path of the comet’s known orbit, bright meteor showers known as Andromedids (or Bielids) were observed. This seemed to prove the idea that meteor showers are composed of fragments of disintegrated comets. Schiaparelli was also the first to show that the Perseid and Leonid meteor showers were associated with comets.

Today we know several annual meteor showers and their connection to periodic comets. The eta Aquarids and Orionids are associated with the famous comet 1P/Halley. The Southern Taurids are associated with comet 2P/Enke. I've already explained that the Andomedids come from comet 3P/Biela, the comet that broke into two pieces and then disintegrated entirely. The Leonids come from debris left behind from comet 55P/Temple-Tuttle and, getting back to our August astronomy story, the Perseids occur when Earth encounters the stream of dust left behind from comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle.

And here is another story within a story, the naming convention for comets. What is all this 1P/ and 2D stuff all about?

The exact rules for comet nomenclature are pretty involved, but essentially the letter P stands for a periodic comet with a period of less than 200 years. C stands for a comet that is not periodic, and D stands for a comet that has broken up or been lost, a dark comet. The names associated with comets are most often the discoverer or co-discoverers of the comet, although some of them, like Halley's Comet are named after the astronomers who first calculated their orbits rather than their original discoverers. The number corresponds to the order and number of discovery of that type of comet. 109P/Swift-Tuttle, the comet responsible for the Perseid meteor shower each year, is therefore the 109th periodic comet known, and it is named after its co-discoverers, Swift and Tuttle; which leads us to two more stories behind the story of the Perseid meteors.

Who were Swift and Tuttle?

Lewis Swift was born in Clarkson, New York on February 29, 1820. Swift was a farmer and hardware store owner by trade. Between 1866 and 1892 he discovered thirteen comets, making him one of the most prolific comet discoverers of all time. Lewis Swift's life story is one of pain, perseverance, disappointment, delight, fame and fortune.

According to Swift, he first really became interested in astronomy after observing the Great Comet of 1843. This comet was so bright it could be seen in broad daylight and its tail extended 40 degrees across the sky!

Swift made his first telescope, a 3-inch refractor with a lens purchased for $5.00 from the Spencer Optical Company. In 1858 the 3-inch was accidentally broken, so Swift purchased a 4 1/2-inch 'comet seeker' from the American optical craftsman Henry Fitz. This was the telescope he made all but one of his comet discoveries with. His early observatories weren't much more than small platforms built on the roof of his barn, accessed through a hole cut in the roof.

His first comet discovery, and the one he is most famous for, was actually quite by accident. Upon hearing of the discovery of a comet in the northern sky, near Polaris, the North Star, Swift decided to observe the comet one July evening in 1862. After less than five minutes he came across a beautiful comet that he took for granted was the comet he had been looking for. After following the comet for several nights it become clear that this was actually a different comet. In fact, it was the same comet that Harvard astronomer Horace Tuttle had independently discovered a few days after Swift.

It was in 1866 that Giavonni Shiaparelli announced that comet 1862III (Swift-Tuttle) traveled in an orbit virtually identical to the Perseid meteor stream. Swift and Tuttle argued bitterly for years over who deserved credit for this important comet's discovery.

In 1872, Swift moved to Rochester, New York and opened a hardware store. He became well known for discovering comets with his 4 1/2-inch telescope from the roof a local cider mill. As his popularity increased, he began to give lectures on astronomy and often held what we now call star parties, showing people comets and other celestial wonders in Lake View Park.

In 1879, Swift found a generous patron in Rochester patent medicine businessman Hulbert Harrington Warner, who financed the building of an observatory for Swift. Warner assured "Professor Swift" as he had become known, that if Swift could raise the money to purchase a large telescope, Warner would build an observatory for it. The original estimate for construction of the observatory was $20,000.

Swift was able to fulfill his part of the bargain by collecting donations for a 16-inch Alvan Clark & Son telescope from the people of Rochester, NY.  When the observatory opened it was the fourth largest telescope in the United States. The plans for the observatory also called for an astronomical library, an elevator and a residence for Professor Swift and his family. Ultimately, the Observatory cost Warner $100,000.

The observatory itself was the first observatory in the world to encourage visits by the general public. All a visitor had to do was buy a ticket for 25 cents at Warner's business on St. Paul Street. It became so well known that it was included in travel guidebooks.

Soon after the observatory opened in 1882, Swift closed his hardware store and became, for all intents and purposes, a professional astronomer. Swift's attentions soon turned from comets to nebulae. While Charles Messier had considered them to be mostly annoyances to the discovery of comets, Swift believed they were worthy of study in their own right. By the end of his career he had discovered over 1200 objects, ranking him third behind the Herschels and number one among American observers.

He was awarded an honorary Ph.D. from Rochester University, and received more medals than any other astronomer of his time, including three from the Imperial Academy of Science in Australia, four from the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, and the Laplace Medal from the French Astronomical Society. In 1897 he was the first person awarded the Jackson-Gwilt Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In 1893, motivated largely by the construction of an Episcopal church next door to the observatory that blocked his view to the sky, Swift relocated the 16-inch telescope to Lowe Observatory on Echo Mountain in California, where he spent the remainder of his career. Swift discovered his last comet in 1899 at the age of 79. Although some of his comet discoveries can surely be said to be lucky, most were the result of persistent, systematic, tireless observations. Swift was known to remark often, "One cannot discover comets lying in bed."

The second half of the story behind the discovery of Comet Swift-Tuttle is Horace Parnell Tuttle. Born March 17, 1837 in Newfield, Maine, Horace's life story is a bit more of a mystery.

Charles Wesley Tuttle, Horace's older brother, was an amateur astronomer who constructed his own telescope, and upon visiting the Harvard Observatory so impressed observatory director, William Bond, he was hired as an assistant observer. This was Horace's connection and eventual inroad to working at Harvard Observatory later on.

Charles was eventually replaced at Harvard by his younger brother Horace as an observatory assistant. Horace became attached to the observatory's four-inch Merz comet seeker, which he used on the balconies of the observatory of the 15-inch refractor, spending night after night in search of new comets. While not as prolific as Swift, Horace Tuttle proved to be a successful comet hunter.

He discovered or co-discovered numerous comets, including 55P/Tempel-Tuttle, parent body of the Leonid meteor shower, 109P/Swift-Tuttle, parent body of the Perseid meteor shower, and the "Great Comet of 1860." Other comets that bear his name are 8P/Tuttle, parent comet of the Ursid meteor shower, 41P/Tuttle-Giacobini-Kresak and C/1861 Y1 Tuttle. In 1859 he was awarded the Lalande Prize of the French Academy of Sciences for discovering of two comets in one year (1858).

With the outbreak of the Civil War, Horace Tuttle enlisted in the 44th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry and served at New Bern, North Carolina. He continued to make astronomical observations during the war, reporting on the appearance of Comet Tempel 1864 II.

The war had taken Tuttle out of comet seeking for three and a half years, so his discovery of comet 1866 I at the U.S. Naval Observatory on January 5th, 1866 must have felt pretty good after such a long hiatus. This was Comet Tempel-Tuttle, first discovered by the French astronomer, Tempel, more than two weeks earlier. Tuttle received a lot of press for this discovery since it was only the second comet ever discovered at the Naval Observatory.

In 1887 Tuttle obtained a 6.5-inch broken-back reflecting comet seeker, made for him by John Brashear. It was installed on the roof of the Naval Observatory, where he made his last comet discovery, a recovery of Comet 1888V Barnard.

Tuttle lived in the Washington, D.C. area from about 1884 until his death in 1923. In his final years he was feeble and blind. His gravesite is unmarked and its location is unknown.

Comet Swift-Tuttle itself is a pretty intersting story. It is the largest object known to make repeated passes near the Earth. It is also one of the oldest known periodic comets with sightings by the Chinese as far back as 68 B.C. The best estimate of when it will return is July, 2126.

The first attempt at computing a definitive orbit was made in 1889, when F. Hayn determined the orbital period to be 119.64 years. In 1971, Brian Marsden and Zdenek Sekanina took 212 positions obtained during the period of July 22 to October 22, 1862, applied perturbations by all nine planets, and came to a similar conclusion, 119.98 years.

A couple of years later, Marsden considered the possibility of linking Swift-Tuttle to an earlier comet. He found two in the 18th century that looked promising--1737 (Kegler) and 1750 (Wargentin). The 1750 comet appeared at just about the right time, but the 1750 comet seemed to be moving too fast to fit the orbital calculations. The 1737 comet actually exhibited a motion consistent with what would have been expected for Swift-Tuttle but the comet's period would have to have been some 10 years longer than was indicated by the observations in 1862.

Marsden made two predictions for a forthcoming return. First, using the definitive orbit calculated by Sekanina and himself, he suggested a perihelion date of September 16, 1981. Second, he suggested that if the link to the comet of 1737 was valid, Swift-Tuttle would most likely return to perihelion on November 25, 1992.

Initial searches for the comet began in 1980, which was within the error range given by calculations, and more rigorous searches were conducted in 1981 and 1982, but the comet was not recovered.

On September 26, 1992, Tsuruhiko Kiuchi, from Japan, discovered a comet and reported it to the National Astronomical Observatory in Tokyo. Several observers were able to confirm the comet within the next 24 hours and the direction and rate of motion were consistent with what would be expected for Swift-Tuttle. The long lost parent of the Perseid meteor shower had indeed returned.

After refining the calculations of its orbit and looking at predictions of its next return, there was some concern that Swift-Tuttle might actually collide with Earth in 2126!

The comet has a diameter of 10 kilometers, and if it did hit the Earth going 60km/sec, it would be catastrophic. The collision would be 1 billion times more powerful than the atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima. An impact similar to this is believed to have caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. Swift-Tuttle crashing into the planet could create a cloud of dust that would block out the sun, killing all plant life, and causing an ice age.

What are the chances it will hit? It's difficult to estimate. The comet will only collide with the Earth if the two bodies occupy the same space within a narrow three and a half minute window of their orbits. A difference of one hour would cause the comet to miss the Earth by about 100,000 kilometers. Considering the last calculations were off by 10 years, you can imagine how difficult it is to be sure one way or the other.

We haven't heard the last of comet 109P/Swift-Tuttle. In less than 120 years our ancestors will be learning about Professor Swift's comet as it makes another pass through the inner Solar System, leaving a trail of meteoroids behind to delight another generation with August meteor showers for another 130 years.

The Edgar Wilson Award 2009

The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory announced August 22nd that the 2009 Edgar Wilson Award for the discovery of comets is being divided among five individuals for five different comets.

Robert E. Holmes, Jr. (Charleston, IL, U.S.A.) for C/2008 N1, Stanislav Maticic (Crni Vrh Observatory, Slovenia) for C/2008 Q1, Michel Ory (Delemont, Switzerland) for P/2008 Q2; Koichi Itagaki (Yamagata, Japan) for C/2009 E1, and Dae-am Yi (Yeongwol-kun, Gangwon-do, Korea) for C/2009 F6.

Comet Holmes image credit: Alan Dyer

Each award is composed of a monetary award from the Edgar Wilson Charitable Trust Fund and an award plaque. The award is given annually to the amateur astronomers who, using amateur equipment, have discovered one or more new comets. Only comets officially named for their discoverers shall be included in the annual count.

Past winners include, David H. Levy, Tucson, AZ, U.S.A. (P/2006 T1), Donald Edward Machholz, Jr., Colfax, CA, U.S.A. (C/2004 Q2), William A. Bradfield, Yankalilla, S. Australia (C/2004 F4), and some variable star observers I know, among them; Vance Avery Petriew, Regina, SK, Canada (P/2001 Q2), Albert F. A. L. Jones, Stoke, Nelson, New Zealand (C/2000 W1), and Peter Williams, Heathcote, N.S.W., Australia (C/1998 P1).

It is amazing to me the number of comets still discovered by amateurs each year, and how many of them are made the old fashioned way- visually. During the first eight years of Wilson Awards (1999-2006), 17 awards went to visual discoverers of comets, 10 awards went to CCD discoverers, and one award went to a photographic discoverer of a comet.

Congratulations to this year's amateur comet sleuths.

Comet Simonsen

I don't observe comets very often. Unless they have reached naked eye brilliance and sport a magnificent tail, they're just not that exciting to look at. Most are faint fuzzy balls with no real tail to speak of; not what most people picture in their minds eye when they think of a comet.

That said, it would still be pretty cool to stumble upon one in the course of an evening observing variable stars. I spend a lot of time out under the stars with my eye to the eyepiece. After years observing variables, most of the star fields have become very familiar. I've seen lots of unexpected things- meteors streaking through the field of view, asteroids masquerading as new stars, satellites and aircraft blazing through the field, but I've never happened upon a comet.

Tuesday night I was working my way from Auriga, Canis Minor and Gemini heading to Cancer. Cancer has a disproportionate number of cataclysmic variables for such a small, faint constellation, so I always look forward to that part of my program. But just before I get there I make a little side trip to Hydra. I can only view faint objects to a certain angle above the horizon, and much of Hydra is just too low for me. So I only have two stars I observe in Hydra.

When I pointed the scope to the first one, CT Hydra and put my eye to the eyepiece everything seemed normal at first. CT Hya was too faint for me to see, so it was not in outburst. I checked my usual comparison stars to see how faint a limit I would record in my report. When I glanced toward the 14.0V comparison star I was shocked to see a fairly bright fuzzy blob just to the SE of it!

I moved the telescope ever so slightly, back and forth, to make sure it wasn't a reflection in the EP, and it stayed right where it was in relation to the field stars. I looked at it for a while and decided it was real enough, so I took the paper chart out of its page protector and drew the position and size of the object, as accurately as I could, in relation to the stars on the chart.

At this point, I was intrigued enough to go inside and try to identify just what comet this was that had intruded into my night of variable star observing. I fired up my planetarium program and asked it to show all comets within a degree of CT Hya. Nothing. I logged into the Minor Planet Checker website, typed in the coordinates of my 'comet' and searched for anything within 30'. Nothing.

How on earth did the surveys miss anything this bright this close to the celestial equator near new moon? Did I just discover a new comet? Now I was getting excited.

I emailed several observer friends and asked them to take CCD images of the field for confirmation. Then I logged into Global Rent A Scope (GRAS) in New Mexico, and fired up scope 4 which has a pretty enormous field of view for a CCD. I scripted it to run and take a 240 second exposure with a clear filter. If it was real, it should show up as a bright fuzzy object near the middle of the image.

No one got my message until much later or the next morning, but I did get two images of the area from the GRAS scope. I examined them online and was disappointed to see nothing where I expected a bright comet to be.

In the time it took to check for known comets, email friends, start the telescope, cool the CCD, autofocus, slew to the target, take images and upload them to the GRAS site, it had begun to cloud over here at home. I didn't get a second chance to see what was going on in the eyepiece of my telescope. I chalked it up to mysteries of the universe and turned in for the night. I also never made it to my variables in Cancer.

Thursday at lunch time, I was working on my data from Sonoita Research Observatory (SRO) in Arizona, so I had my photometry software up and running on the computer. I decided to download the images I took of the CT Hya field to see if I could detect the variable and submit a positive faint observation of it. When I pulled up the images on the screen and zoomed in, there was my comet!

It was a lot fainter than I expected to see, and it had moved considerably from the position I indicated on my chart, but it was there in both images, and it looked like it had moved in a straight line away from my original sighting between exposures.

I got excited all over again. Here was proof. I had pictures of Comet Simonsen! Not being an expert in cometary images, properties or motion, I emailed my images to several people, some of them experts in CCD imaging and photometry, for feedback. Was this a comet? Can they move this far in an hour or so? How come its so faint? Did I do something wrong? Or is this an artifact on the images?

I was hoping it was a comet. My comet...Comet Simonsen...discovered serendipitously while observing variable stars...I could see the headlines. What are the chances I could see something in the eyepiece, take CCD images of it and nothing was really there. I mean, C'mon, man. It's got to be a real comet, right?

I got the bad news later that night and then confirmation that it was "an interesting artifact, but not a comet" again the next morning. Stop the presses. It's not a comet.

I still don't know what I saw in the telescope that night. I'm gonna call it a UFO: Unidentified Frustrating Object. I'd have been a lot happier just working my way through my CVs in Cancer that night. As it turns out I missed an outburst of one of my favorite stars, SY Cnc, while I was messing around trying to discover Comet Simonsen 2009.

Stuff happens...
close