Re: PHP 6

From:Date:Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:50:05 +0000
Subject:Re: PHP 6
References:1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Groups:php.internals 
Request:Send a blank email to internals+get-47168@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
 On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Christopher Jones <christopher.jones@oracle.com> wrote: >>> Lester Caine wrote:>>> Currently maintaining the 5.2 branch is essential until such time as all>> extensions are available in official builds of PHP on windows! Forcing>> projects to change their development platforms simply to support a blinkered>> set of rules on PHP is not helpful in moving the project forward. How many>> extensions are currently stable in 5.2 on windows but not supported in 5.3?>> Private builds of the extensions in 5.3 are running without problems ....>> but having to direct users to other sites is as bad as the current>> fragmentation in the core code?>>>> Nobody is arguing against maintaining 5.2 for the near-mid future.> If you want Windows binaries, start building . . . . No need to, there were two missing, firebird and smnp. Smnp is back, firebird will likely be as well in 5.3.3 (thanks to Marius work). -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org

Thread (113 messages)

« previousphp.internals (#47168)next »
close