if you mentioned windows builds, whats the current status of http://pecl4win.php.net/ ? Tyrael On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > Rafael Dohms wrote:>>>> 2010/3/11 Johannes Schlüter<johannes@php.net>:>>>>>>>> On the other hand merging tests to5.2 and 5.3 means that we can find new>>> BC breaks we had overseen and either fix them or document them properly..>>>>>> So I won't "waste" too much time but not forget about 5.2.>>>>> As much as I agree with the push for 5.3 adoption, its surely not a>> reality with most of the community out>> there, like the hosting companies for example.>>>> So like last year i guess we should surely focus on 5.3, but not>> discourage any 5.2 work and keep writing>> the test for all across, 5.2, 5.3, 6.0>>>> Everyone at our test fest did that, save in cases where the>> functionality was not available or altered, the>> tests we basically the same for all versions, and i even caught a few>> 5.2 issues in the process.>>>> I agree in keeping the tests alive for 5.2.>> Currently maintaining the 5.2 branch is essential until such time as all> extensions are available in official builds of PHP on windows! Forcing> projects to change their development platforms simply to support a blinkered> set of rules on PHP is not helpful in moving the project forward. How many> extensions are currently stable in 5.2 on windows but not supported in 5.3?> Private builds of the extensions in 5.3 are running without problems ....> but having to direct users to other sites is as bad as the current> fragmentation in the core code?>> --> Lester Caine - G8HFL> -----------------------------> Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact> L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk> EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/> Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//> Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php>> --> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php>>
