Subject of the issue

I'm not sure if this is really an issue but it might be related to issues reported in conjunction with RAWX and SFRBX. I would appreciate if somebody could confirm that the current implementation is correct.

In getRXMSFRBX and getRXMRAWX respectively, there is a call to checkUbloxInternal(&packetCfg, UBX_CLASS_TIM, UBX_TIM_TM2);. This seems odd as I would have expected a call similar to checkUbloxInternal(&packetCfg, UBX_CLASS_RXM, UBX_RXM_RAWX);. This is also the case in other functions.

Can somebody confirm that the current implementation is correct?