Improved memory usage on core/libraries install

[cmaglie]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

See how to contribute

• The PR has no duplicates (please search among the Pull Requests
  before creating one)
• The PR follows
  our contributing guidelines
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
• Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
• UPGRADING.md has been updated with a migration guide (for breaking changes)
• configuration.schema.json updated if new parameters are added.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

This PR should improve memory usage on .zip archive extraction (for example on core install).
This is obtained through the upgrade of the 'extract' library.

What is the current behavior?

$ /usr/bin/time -f "%P %M" ./arduino-cli core install esp32:esp32 --additional-urls https://espressif.github.io/arduino-esp32/package_esp32_index.json 105% 1520148 $ 

What is the new behavior?

$ /usr/bin/time -f "%P %M" ./arduino-cli core install esp32:esp32 --additional-urls https://espressif.github.io/arduino-esp32/package_esp32_index.json 107% 272356 $ 

Does this PR introduce a breaking change, and is titled accordingly?

No

Other information

Upstream patch: codeclysm/extract#21
Should fix: #2175

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: -0.02⚠️

Comparison is base (ca79383) 62.83% compared to head (7ff855a) 62.82%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@ Coverage Diff @@## master #2187 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 62.83% 62.82% -0.02%  ========================================== Files 220 220 Lines 19477 19477 ========================================== - Hits 12239 12236 -3 - Misses 6150 6152 +2 - Partials 1088 1089 +1 

Flag	Coverage Δ
unit	62.82% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.