2
\$\begingroup\$

The code is an implementation of looping text (similar to a circular buffer - wraps around when it reaches the edge of the defined bounds) with directional control.

The code is functional and works as intended, but I'm curious if there is anyway to improve the code even if it is only a small improvement (e.g. less garbage produced per loop cycle as a micro-optimisation, etc).

# cleaned up and improved prototype code for looping text scroll. # added direction from the original code. from sys import stdout from time import sleep global_shifted_text_array = [] global_text_length = 0 DIRECTION_LEFT_TO_RIGHT = -1 DIRECTION_RIGHT_TO_LEFT = 1 def set_text(text): global global_shifted_text_array global global_text_length global_shifted_text_array = pad_text(text) global_text_length = len(global_shifted_text_array) def pad_text(text, padding = 5): text += ' ' * padding return list(text) def shift_text(direction): global global_shifted_text_array range = xrange(global_text_length - 1, -1, -1) if direction == DIRECTION_LEFT_TO_RIGHT else xrange(global_text_length) # by the time the zero element is set in the for loop. # it is set to the last element (which is empty) # so we have to account for this by correcting for it. if direction == DIRECTION_RIGHT_TO_LEFT: first_element = global_shifted_text_array[0] for i in range: global_shifted_text_array[i] = global_shifted_text_array[((i + direction) % global_text_length)] # print 'global_shifted_text_array[{}] = global_shifted_text_array[{}]'.format(i, ((i + direction) % global_text_length)) if direction == DIRECTION_RIGHT_TO_LEFT: global_shifted_text_array[global_text_length - 1] = first_element def update_loop(direction = DIRECTION_LEFT_TO_RIGHT, frequency = 0.1): while 1: shift_text(direction) stdout.write('\r{0}'.format(''.join(global_shifted_text_array))) sleep(frequency) set_text('Beautiful Lie') update_loop() 
\$\endgroup\$

    1 Answer 1

    1
    \$\begingroup\$

    When I try it, it doesn't really work unless I add stdout.flush() after each stdout.write().

    The padding isn't controllable, as neither set_text() nor update_loop() accepts a padding parameter.

    In my opinion, it should print the original text before performing the first shift.

    Global variables are bad. In this case, I'd eliminate them altogether by simplifying the code. Take advantage of itertools.cycle() and Python's support for negative indexes. I wouldn't bother with converting the string to a list and back to a string again.

    DIRECTION_LEFT_TO_RIGHT is a bit verbose. I suggest SCROLL_RIGHT instead. "Frequency" sounds like it should go faster as the number increases: 10 Hz is faster than 1 Hz. I suggest period as the name for the delay.

    from itertools import cycle from sys import stdout from time import sleep SCROLL_RIGHT = -1 SCROLL_LEFT = +1 def animate_text(text, scroll=SCROLL_RIGHT, period=0.5, padding=5): text += ' ' * padding for offset in cycle(xrange(0, scroll * len(text), scroll)): stdout.write('\r' + text[offset:] + text[:offset]) stdout.flush() sleep(period) animate_text('Beautiful Lie') 
    \$\endgroup\$
    4
    • \$\begingroup\$I intentionally avoiding using itertools as I plan on reimplementing this in C#, so I have avoided anything "pythonic". Thanks for the suggestions on naming I've taken that advice! By the way I think that SCROLL_LEFT = +1 is verbose since the plus isn't needed.\$\endgroup\$
      – user180837
      CommentedSep 29, 2018 at 22:31
    • \$\begingroup\$If you're interested in C#, ask a follow-up question in C#. Don't let C#'s limitations force you to do silly things in Python.\$\endgroup\$CommentedSep 29, 2018 at 22:32
    • \$\begingroup\$Haha, I guess it is silly to implement it this way in Python but I have a preference for doing all prototyping in Python. Is there any equivalent of itertools.cycle() in C#?\$\endgroup\$
      – user180837
      CommentedSep 29, 2018 at 22:34
    • \$\begingroup\$If you have a C# question, then post a C# question.\$\endgroup\$CommentedSep 29, 2018 at 22:35