1443

I have an array like

vendors = [{ Name: 'Magenic', ID: 'ABC' }, { Name: 'Microsoft', ID: 'DEF' } // and so on... ]; 

How do I check this array to see if "Magenic" exists? I don't want to loop, unless I have to. I'm working with potentially a couple of thousand records.

0

    29 Answers 29

    2266

    There isn't any need to reinvent the wheel loop, at least not explicitly.

    Use some as it allows the browser to stop as soon as one element is found that matches:

    if (vendors.some(e => e.Name === 'Magenic')) { // We found at least one object that we're looking for! } 

    or the equivalent (in this case) with find, which returns the found object instead of a boolean:

    if (vendors.find(e => e.Name === 'Magenic')) { // Usually the same result as above, but find returns the element itself } 

    If you'd like to get the position of that element, use findIndex:

    const i = vendors.findIndex(e => e.Name === 'Magenic'); if (i > -1) { // We know that at least 1 object that matches has been found at the index i } 

    If you need to get all of the objects that match:

    if (vendors.filter(e => e.Name === 'Magenic').length > 0) { // The same result as above, but filter returns all objects that match } 

    If you need compatibility with really old browsers that don't support arrow functions, then your best bet is:

    if (vendors.filter(function(e) { return e.Name === 'Magenic'; }).length > 0) { // The same result as above, but filter returns all objects that match and we avoid an arrow function for compatibility } 
    11
    • 5
      @CAFxX How would you get the index when found? is this even a possibility or would a loop work better to get the index?
      – Echtniet
      CommentedApr 3, 2018 at 20:44
    • 5
      @Echtniet if you need the index then vendors.findIndex will give you the index of the first matching element. If instead you need the value then either vendors.find will give the first matching element, or vendors.filter will give you all matching elements. You may want to refer to developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…
      – CAFxX
      CommentedApr 4, 2018 at 22:05
    • 3
      Why is somebetter yet ?
      – 7hibault
      CommentedApr 19, 2019 at 16:29
    • 26
      @7hibault because some can short circuit once an object with name === "Magenic" is found. With filter, it will check each item till the end of the array and create a new array items which match the condition, then check the length
      – adiga
      CommentedMay 14, 2019 at 14:03
    • 8
      Lots of comments about .some. It's 2019, use .some and use Polyfills to support lousy browsers and move on with you life... polyfill.io/v3/url-builder. The only thing I can see is that if you can't support arrow functions then it's as simple as the Polyfill I mentioned and: arr.some(function(i) { return i.Name === "Magenic" })
      – maxshuty
      CommentedDec 24, 2019 at 12:37
    388

    2018 edit: This answer is from 2011, before browsers had widely supported array filtering methods and arrow functions. Have a look at CAFxX's answer.

    There is no "magic" way to check for something in an array without a loop. Even if you use some function, the function itself will use a loop. What you can do is break out of the loop as soon as you find what you're looking for to minimize computational time.

    var found = false; for(var i = 0; i < vendors.length; i++) { if (vendors[i].Name == 'Magenic') { found = true; break; } } 
    9
    • 5
      No problem. Keep in mind that Keith's solution is also very viable and saves you from looping.CommentedNov 21, 2011 at 19:41
    • 2
      You don't need a flag if all you need to know is whether or not "something" is in, you can just check the value of the scan index with the size of array. For this to work the index var needs to be declared before the for statement of course.
      – Alex
      CommentedOct 29, 2014 at 21:05
    • 7
      These options seem to work now: vendors.forEach, vendors.filter, vendors.reduceCommentedAug 5, 2016 at 13:45
    • 1
      what about JSON.stringify(vendors).indexOf('Magenic') !== -1CommentedMar 14, 2019 at 12:23
    • 4
      @LastBreath that could result in a false positive quite easily if 'Magenic' is somewhere else in the objectCommentedMar 15, 2019 at 16:22
    219

    No loop necessary. Three methods that come to mind:

    Array.prototype.some()

    This is the most exact answer for your question, i.e. "check if something exists", implying a bool result. This will be true if there are any 'Magenic' objects, false otherwise:

    let hasMagenicVendor = vendors.some( vendor => vendor['Name'] === 'Magenic' ) 

    Array.prototype.filter()

    This will return an array of all 'Magenic' objects, even if there is only one (will return a one-element array):

    let magenicVendors = vendors.filter( vendor => vendor['Name'] === 'Magenic' ) 

    If you try to coerce this to a boolean, it will not work, as an empty array (no 'Magenic' objects) is still truthy. So just use magenicVendors.length in your conditional.

    Array.prototype.find()

    This will return the first 'Magenic' object (or undefined if there aren't any):

    let magenicVendor = vendors.find( vendor => vendor['Name'] === 'Magenic' ); 

    This coerces to a boolean okay (any object is truthy, undefined is falsy).


    Note: I'm using vendor["Name"] instead of vendor.Name because of the weird casing of the property names.

    Note 2: No reason to use loose equality (==) instead of strict equality (===) when checking the name.

    3
    • 11
      It's useful to point out that under the hood, these are all looping. These are also all slower computationally than simply for looping and performing operations.CommentedJan 18, 2017 at 19:31
    • May as well go share that love here: stackoverflow.com/questions/21748670/… so more people like me don't navigate to that old page and make assumptions.CommentedJan 19, 2017 at 15:55
    • @ThePartyTurtle: True!! Though developer hours are often more expensive compared to users' CPU hours (and less code is often nice).CommentedSep 14, 2022 at 13:37
    82

    The accepted answer still works but now we have an ECMAScript 6 native methods [Array.find][1] and [Array.some][2] to achieve the same effect.

    Array.some

    Use some If you only want to determine if an element exists i.e. you need a true/false determination.

    Quoting MDN:

    The some() method tests whether at least one element in the array passes the test implemented by the provided function. It returns true if, in the array, it finds an element for which the provided function returns true; otherwise it returns false. It doesn't modify the array.

    Array.find

    Use find if you want to get the matched object from array else returns undefined.

    Quoting MDN:

    The find() method returns the value of the first element in the provided array that satisfies the provided testing function. If no values satisfy the testing function, undefined is returned.

    let arr = [ { id: 21, label: 'Banana', }, { id: 22, label: 'Apple', } ] /* note : data is the actual object that matched search criteria or undefined if nothing matched */ let data = arr.find(function(ele) { return ele.id === 21; }); if (data) { console.log('found'); console.log(data); // This is entire object i.e. `item` not boolean } /* note : doesExist is a boolean thats true or false depending on of whether the data was found or not */ let doesExist = arr.some(function(ele) { return ele.id === 21; }); 

    See my jsfiddle link There is a polyfill for IE provided by mozilla

    5
    • 3
      Could be shorter if you just do return ele.id == '2', but +1 for a good ES6 solution.
      – Lye Fish
      CommentedMar 5, 2016 at 1:47
    • Good to have fresh answer :) Just wondering if performance are better or not than answers above...CommentedJul 22, 2016 at 7:45
    • I think it is important to point out that the return value of 'data' (when ele.id matches an id, such as '21') is going to be the array item itself (in this case, the whole item object). If the expectation was that the data variable result would be 'true' or 'false' instead of a falsy value, you would be sorely disappointed.
      – adamgede
      CommentedMar 10, 2017 at 2:01
    • Thx! My task was a bit different. Get the index of Object in the Array => push if <0 || splice(index, 1) here is my a bit updated code: const index = this.selected.indexOf(this.selected.find(s => s.id == passedObj.id))CommentedAug 24, 2017 at 8:27
    • This code only works if return ele.id === 21;; it's a number, not a string.
      – user5161995
      CommentedDec 1, 2021 at 16:00
    52

    Here's the way I'd do it

    const found = vendors.some(item => item.Name === 'Magenic'); 

    array.some() method checks if there is at least one value in an array that matches criteria and returns a boolean. From here on you can go with:

    if (found) { // do something } else { // do something else } 
    0
      31

      Unless you want to restructure it like this:

      vendors = { Magenic: { Name: 'Magenic', ID: 'ABC' }, Microsoft: { Name: 'Microsoft', ID: 'DEF' } and so on... }; 

      to which you can do if(vendors.Magnetic)

      You will have to loop

      2
      • 3
        In case he still wanted to maintain the object structure to use it else whereCommentedNov 21, 2011 at 19:38
      • how would you do that?CommentedOct 9, 2020 at 7:24
      28

      A JavaScript array has two methods, the some and every methods that return a Boolean and can help you achieve this.

      I think some would be most appropriate for what you intend to achieve.

      vendors.some(vendor => vendor['Name'] !== 'Magenic') 

      Some validates that any of the objects in the array satisfies the given condition.

      vendors.every(vendor => vendor['Name'] !== 'Magenic') 

      every validates that all the objects in the array satisfies the given condition.

      1
      • @ThanwaCh. - it should return false! In your case you need to use array.some method!CommentedJul 22, 2020 at 22:57
      26

      As per the ECMAScript 6 specification, you can use findIndex.

      const magenicIndex = vendors.findIndex(vendor => vendor.Name === 'Magenic');

      magenicIndex will hold either 0 (which is the index in the array) or -1 if it wasn't found.

      2
      • 1
        Just to make people aware that 0 would still match as a false result if that was used as the condition. For this reason I think find() is better as you get a more logical truthy evaluation.
        – dhj
        CommentedApr 4, 2018 at 12:32
      • Not only what @dhj mentioned, but also, it might be found at a later index (1, 2 etc). As such, you'll need to check whether the index is at least 0, so most solutions that directly yield a boolean-usable value will be more elegant.
        – Egor Hans
        CommentedNov 24, 2021 at 8:00
      23

      As the OP has asked the question if the key exists or not:

      A more elegant solution that will return a Boolean using the ES6reduce function can be:

      const magenicVendorExists = vendors.reduce((accumulator, vendor) => (accumulator||vendor.Name === "Magenic"), false); 

      Note: The initial parameter of reduce is a false and if the array has the key it will return true.

      1
      • 2
        Please also check Mirza Leka's solution. A much more elegant solution.CommentedOct 18, 2019 at 4:01
      14

      You cannot without looking into the object really.

      You probably should change your structure a little, like

      vendors = { Magenic: 'ABC', Microsoft: 'DEF' }; 

      Then you can just use it like a lookup-hash.

      vendors['Microsoft']; // 'DEF' vendors['Apple']; // undefined 
        12
        const check = vendors.find((item)=>item.Name==='Magenic') console.log(check) 

        Try this code.

        If the item or element is present then the output will show you that element. If it is not present then the output will be 'undefined'.

          11

          Testing for array elements:

          JavaScript offers array functions which allow you to achieve this relatively easily. They are the following:

          1. Array.prototype.filter: Takes a callback function which is a test, the array is then iterated over with is callback and filtered according to this callback. A new filtered array is returned.
          2. Array.prototype.some: Takes a callback function which is a test, the array is then iterated over with is callback and if any element passes the test,the boolean true is returned. Otherwise false is returned

          The specifics are best explained via an example:

          Example:

          vendors = [ { Name: 'Magenic', ID: 'ABC' }, { Name: 'Microsoft', ID: 'DEF' } //and so on goes array... ]; // filter returns a new array, we instantly check if the length // is longer than zero of this newly created array if (vendors.filter(company => company.Name === 'Magenic').length ) { console.log('I contain Magenic'); } // some would be a better option then filter since it directly returns a boolean if (vendors.some(company => company.Name === 'Magenic')) { console.log('I also contain Magenic'); }

          Browser support:

          These 2 function are ES6 function, not all browsers might support them. To overcome this you can use a polyfill. Here is the polyfill for Array.prototype.some (from MDN):

          if (!Array.prototype.some) { Array.prototype.some = function(fun, thisArg) { 'use strict'; if (this == null) { throw new TypeError('Array.prototype.some called on null or undefined'); } if (typeof fun !== 'function') { throw new TypeError(); } var t = Object(this); var len = t.length >>> 0; for (var i = 0; i < len; i++) { if (i in t && fun.call(thisArg, t[i], i, t)) { return true; } } return false; }; }

            9

            Simplest method so far:

            if (vendors.findIndex(item => item.Name == "Magenic") == -1) { //not found item } else { //found item } 
            0
              7

              My approach to solving this problem is to use ES6 and creating a function that does the check for us. The benefit of this function is that it can be reusable through out your project to check any array of objects given the key and the value to check.

              ENOUGH TALK, LET'S SEE THE CODE

              Array

              const ceos = [ { name: "Jeff Bezos", company: "Amazon" }, { name: "Mark Zuckerberg", company: "Facebook" }, { name: "Tim Cook", company: "Apple" } ]; 

              Function

              const arrayIncludesInObj = (arr, key, valueToCheck) => { return arr.some(value => value[key] === valueToCheck); } 

              Call/Usage

              const found = arrayIncludesInObj(ceos, "name", "Tim Cook"); // true const found = arrayIncludesInObj(ceos, "name", "Tim Bezos"); // false 
              1
              • @SebastianSimon i have updated my code. I want less experienced when I wrote this answer.CommentedFeb 19, 2021 at 17:46
              6

              Functions map, filter, find, and similar are slower than the simple loop. For me they also less readable than the simple loop and harder to debug. Using them looks like a kind of irrational ritual.

              Better have something like this:

               arrayHelper = { arrayContainsObject: function (array, object, key){ for (let i = 0; i < array.length; i++){ if (object[key] === array[i][key]){ return true; } } return false; } }; 

              And use it like this with given OP example:

               vendors = [{ Name: 'Magenic', ID: 'ABC' }, { Name: 'Microsoft', ID: 'DEF' } ]; let abcObject = {ID: 'ABC', Name: 'Magenic'}; let isContainObject = arrayHelper.arrayContainsObject(vendors, abcObject, 'ID'); 
              7
              • 3
                map, filter, find are more readable and code is also smaller and quicker to writeCommentedJun 2, 2021 at 20:37
              • Why are they much slower than the simple loop? As far as I know, they'll have the same time complexity as their simple loop equivalents. For example, both of your codes look like O(n) to me.CommentedJun 14, 2021 at 22:18
              • above method arrayContainsObject is supposed to be a library method that you write once and forget. You actually can write it using array functions if you prefer. And nothing can beat arrayHelper.arrayContainsObject from the point of readability.
                – Yuriy N.
                CommentedAug 13, 2021 at 9:36
              • 1
                @Michael Fulton leanylabs.com/blog/js-forEach-map-reduce-vs-for-for_of This article with a benchmark states for loops 3 times faster.
                – Yuriy N.
                CommentedJan 20, 2022 at 12:35
              • 1
                @JulioSpinelli. Agree, why not? But then we should rename our method to be like findIndexOfObject. So, better to have them both.
                – Yuriy N.
                CommentedFeb 17, 2022 at 18:53
              6

              You have to loop. There isn't any way around it.

              function seekVendor(vendors, name) { for (var i=0, l=vendors.length; i<l; i++) { if (typeof vendors[i] == "object" && vendors[i].Name === name) { return vendors[i]; } } } 

              Of course you could use a library like linq.js to make this more pleasing:

              Enumerable.From(vendors).Where("$.Name == 'Magenic'").First(); 

              (see jsFiddle for a demo)

              I doubt that linq.js will be faster than a straightforward loop, but it certainly is more flexible when things get a little more complicated.

                6

                Correct me if I'm wrong...

                I could have used the forEach method like this,

                var found = false; vendors.forEach(function(item){ if(item.name === "name"){ found = true; } }); 

                Nowadays I'm used to it, because of its simplicity and self-explanatory word.

                1
                • 2
                  Note: no use of return hereCommentedNov 4, 2019 at 12:06
                6

                2021 Solution*

                Lodash .some (documentation) is a clean solution, if you use the _matchesProperty (documentation) shorthand:

                _.some(VENDORS, ['Name', 'Magenic']) 

                Explanation

                This will iterate through the VENDORS Array, looking for an element Object with the Name key having a value of the String 'Magenic'. Once it finds this element, it returns true and stops iterating. If it doesn't find the element after looking through the entire Array, it returns false.

                Code snippet

                const VENDORS = [{ Name: 'Magenic', ID: 'ABC' }, { Name: 'Microsoft', ID: 'DEF' }]; console.log(_.some(VENDORS, ['Name', 'Magenic'])); // true
                <script src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/[email protected]/lodash.min.js"></script>

                * Note that this uses the popular Lodash library to achieve the simplest/shortest possible solution. I'm offering this as an alternative to the existing vanilla JavaScript solutions, for those who are interested.

                0
                  5

                  If you're using jQuery you can take advantage of grep to create array with all matching objects:

                  var results = $.grep(vendors, function (e) { return e.Name == "Magenic"; }); 

                  and then use the results array:

                  for (var i=0, l=results.length; i<l; i++) { console.log(results[i].ID); } 
                    3

                    To compare one object to another, I combine a for in loop (used to loop through objects) and some(). You do not have to worry about an array going out of bounds etc, so that saves some code. Documentation on .some can be found here

                    var productList = [{id: 'text3'}, {id: 'text2'}, {id: 'text4', product: 'Shampoo'}]; // Example of selected products var theDatabaseList = [{id: 'text1'}, {id: 'text2'},{id: 'text3'},{id:'text4', product: 'shampoo'}]; var objectsFound = []; for(let objectNumber in productList){ var currentId = productList[objectNumber].id; if (theDatabaseList.some(obj => obj.id === currentId)) { // Do what you need to do with the matching value here objectsFound.push(currentId); } } console.log(objectsFound); 

                    An alternative way I compare one object to another is to use a nested for loop with Object.keys().length to get the amount of objects in the array. Code below:

                    var productList = [{id: 'text3'}, {id: 'text2'}, {id: 'text4', product: 'Shampoo'}]; // Example of selected products var theDatabaseList = [{id: 'text1'}, {id: 'text2'},{id: 'text3'},{id:'text4', product: 'shampoo'}]; var objectsFound = []; for(var i = 0; i < Object.keys(productList).length; i++){ for(var j = 0; j < Object.keys(theDatabaseList).length; j++){ if(productList[i].id === theDatabaseList[j].id){ objectsFound.push(productList[i].id); } } } console.log(objectsFound); 

                    To answer your exact question, if are just searching for a value in an object, you can use a single for in loop.

                    var vendors = [ { Name: 'Magenic', ID: 'ABC' }, { Name: 'Microsoft', ID: 'DEF' } ]; for(var ojectNumbers in vendors){ if(vendors[ojectNumbers].Name === 'Magenic'){ console.log('object contains Magenic'); } } 
                      3

                      You can use Lodash. If the Lodash library is too heavy for your application, consider chunking out unnecessary functions not used.

                      let newArray = filter(_this.props.ArrayOne, function(item) { return find(_this.props.ArrayTwo, {"speciesId": item.speciesId}); }); 

                      This is just one way to do this. Another one can be:

                      var newArray= []; _.filter(ArrayOne, function(item) { return AllSpecies.forEach(function(cItem){ if (cItem.speciesId == item.speciesId){ newArray.push(item); } }) }); 

                      console.log(arr);

                      The above example can also be rewritten without using any libraries like:

                      var newArray= []; ArrayOne.filter(function(item) { return ArrayTwo.forEach(function(cItem){ if (cItem.speciesId == item.speciesId){ newArray.push(item); } }) }); console.log(arr); 
                        3

                        Many answers here are good and pretty easy. But if your array of objects is having a fixed set of values then you can use the below trick:

                        Map all the names in a object.

                        vendors = [ { Name: 'Magenic', ID: 'ABC' }, { Name: 'Microsoft', ID: 'DEF' } ]; var dirtyObj = {} for(var count=0;count<vendors.length;count++){ dirtyObj[vendors[count].Name] = true //or assign which gives you true. } 

                        Now this dirtyObj you can use again and again without any loop.

                        if(dirtyObj[vendor.Name]){ console.log("Hey! I am available."); } 
                          2

                          Alternatively you can do:

                          const find = (key, needle) => return !!~vendors.findIndex(v => (v[key] === needle)); 
                          1
                          • 1
                            you'd better say why he can do thatCommentedMar 1, 2018 at 20:43
                          2

                          var without2 = (arr, args) => arr.filter(v => v.id !== args.id); Example:

                          without2([{id:1},{id:1},{id:2}],{id:2})

                          Result: without2([{id:1},{id:1},{id:2}],{id:2})

                          1
                          • I think you meant to say Result: [{id:1},{id:1}]
                            – Isaac Pak
                            CommentedNov 26, 2018 at 22:52
                          2
                          const a = [{one:2},{two:2},{two:4}] const b = a.filter(val => "two" in val).length; if (b) { ... } 
                          4
                          • 3
                            Please and some description and make sure the example you provide works.. (filter will not change the original array but clone it).CommentedNov 20, 2019 at 17:06
                          • That doesn’t answer the question. When you wrote this answer, the title was “How to determine if Javascript array contains an object with an attribute that equals a given value?”. You’re checking if an object has a property on its prototype chain, not if the property of an object has a specific value.CommentedFeb 19, 2021 at 11:26
                          • @Sebastian Simon ” The in operator returns true if the specified property is in the specified object or its prototype chain.” from developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…CommentedFeb 20, 2021 at 12:40
                          • @user1665355 Yes, correct. That’s what I said.CommentedFeb 21, 2021 at 20:20
                          2

                          You can try this. It works for me.

                          const _ = require('lodash'); var arr = [ { name: 'Jack', id: 1 }, { name: 'Gabriel', id: 2 }, { name: 'John', id: 3 } ] function findValue(arr,value) { return _.filter(arr, function (object) { return object['name'].toLowerCase().indexOf(value.toLowerCase()) >= 0; }); } console.log(findValue(arr,'jack')) //[ { name: 'Jack', id: 1 } ] 
                          2
                          • Well this is a really old question and I think its update already has the best solution nowadays.CommentedMay 14, 2019 at 14:37
                          • Not everyone uses lodash or wants this dependency. How does the language do it best?CommentedOct 20, 2021 at 20:33
                          0
                           const arrOfObj = [ { id: 1, name: "askavy" }, { id: 2, name: "james" }, { id: 3, name: "mark" }, ] ; const valueCheck = "mark" const index = arrOfObj.findIndex((obj) => { return obj.name === valueCheck ; }) ; (index === -1) ? console.log("Value does not exist") : console.log("Value Exist" ) ; //--------------------------- const exist = arrOfObj.some((obj) => { return obj.name === valueCheck ; }) ; (exist) ? console.log("Value Exist") : console.log("Value does not Exist") ; 
                            0

                            You can filter by id in same line, like as:

                            let entities = [ /* data here */ ]; let toAppend = [ /* data here */ ]; entities.concat(toAppend .filter(item => !entities .map(i => i.id).includes(item.id))), 

                            Dont need compare entry object, you can compare only the identification. The map transform the list of objects to list of ids, now compare the array with includes and filter to discard.

                              -5

                              I would rather go with regex.

                              If your code is as follows,

                              vendors = [ { Name: 'Magenic', ID: 'ABC' }, { Name: 'Microsoft', ID: 'DEF' } ]; 

                              I would recommend

                              /"Name":"Magenic"/.test(JSON.stringify(vendors)) 
                              3
                              • 27
                                Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use regular expressions." Now they have two problems.CommentedOct 12, 2016 at 15:38
                              • 1
                                File this under, just because you can do something, does not mean that you should.
                                – Liam
                                CommentedAug 22, 2018 at 9:14
                              • Snark and humor aside. There are several easy object and array access and iteration methods and expressions. Why would regex ever be your choice here? The question was how to determine if an array contains an object with a property whose value matches "Magenic". False positives for your regex answer: [ { "Not the property you’re looking for": { "Name": "Magenic" } } ], or [ { 'Not the property you’re looking for"Name': "Magenic" } ]; potential false negative (not if question asks for own property, specifically): [ Object.create({ Name: "Magenic" }) ].CommentedFeb 19, 2021 at 11:46

                              Start asking to get answers

                              Find the answer to your question by asking.

                              Ask question

                              Explore related questions

                              See similar questions with these tags.