3

Afternoon all. Currently trying to use Selenium webdriver to loop through a list of links on a page. Specifically, it's clicking a link, grabbing a line of text off said page to write to a file, going back, and clicking the next link in a list. The following is what I have:

 def test_text_saver(self): driver = self.driver textsave = open("textsave.txt","w") list_of_links = driver.find_elements_by_xpath("//*[@id=\"learn-sub\"]/div[4]/div/div/div/div[1]/div[2]/div/div/ul/li") """Initializing Link Count:""" link_count = len(list_of_links) while x <= link_count: print x driver.find_element_by_xpath("//*[@id=\"learn-sub\"]/div[4]/div/div/div/div[1]/div[2]/div/div/ul/li["+str(x)+"]/a").click() text = driver.find_element_by_xpath("//*[@id=\"learn-sub\"]/div[4]/div/div/div/div[1]/div[1]/div[1]/h1").text textsave.write(text+"\n\n") driver.implicitly_wait(5000) driver.back() x += 1 textsave.close() 

When run, it goes to the initial page, and...goes back to the main page, rather than the subpage that it's supposed to. Printing x, I can see it's incrementing three times rather than one. It also crashes after that. I've checked all my xpaths and such, and also confirmed that it's getting the correct count for the number of links in the list.

Any input's hugely appreciated--this is really just to flex my python/automation, since I'm just getting into both. Thanks in advance!!

    1 Answer 1

    3

    I'm not sure if this will fix the problem, but in general it is better to use WebDriverWait rather than implicitly_wait since WebDriveWait.until will keep calling the supplied function (e.g. driver.find_element_by_xpath) until the returned value is not False-ish or the timeout (e.g 5000 seconds) is reached -- at which point it raises a selenium.common.execptions.TimeoutException.

    import selenium.webdriver.support.ui as UI def test_text_saver(self): driver = self.driver wait = UI.WebDriverWait(driver, 5000) with open("textsave.txt","w") as textsave: list_of_links = driver.find_elements_by_xpath("//*[@id=\"learn-sub\"]/div[4]/div/div/div/div[1]/div[2]/div/div/ul/li/a") for link in list_of_links: # 2 link.click() # 1 text = wait.until( lambda driver: driver.find_element_by_xpath("//*[@id=\"learn-sub\"]/div[4]/div/div/div/div[1]/div[1]/div[1]/h1").text) textsave.write(text+"\n\n") driver.back() 
    1. After you click the link, you should wait until the linked url is loaded. So the call to wait.until is placed directly after link.click()
    2. Instead of using

      while x <= link_count: ... x += 1 

      it is better to use

      for link in list_of_links: 

      For one think, it improves readability. Moreover, you really don't need to care about the number x, all you really care about is looping over the links, which is what the for-loop does.

    6
    • Aaaah gotcha, understood on the WebDriverWait. Tried it, but the behavior was still the same as before. Logically, it should be iterating properly in the li item. Admittedly though, I could very easily be missing something. I'd paste my shell output, but I'm afraid I've a character limit. What's odd is that it looks like it's completely ignoring the wait, and clicking...I'm not rightly sure what div it's clicking, but it's not the one it's supposed to be.
      – TRoch
      CommentedMar 10, 2014 at 20:23
    • Is the URL publicly accessible? If so, post it and I'll try it out.
      – unutbu
      CommentedMar 10, 2014 at 20:46
    • Unfortunately not--new behavior though! Once I figure out code formatting in comments, anyway...using the for loop above inside a while loop (to increment x for the list item), it's not even incrementing...yet it's printing the heading on the initial page out to the file 30 times, so it's obviously going through the loop the 30 times. (Oh the perks of being new to both Python and Selenium...)
      – TRoch
      CommentedMar 10, 2014 at 20:56
    • So: while x <= link_count: for element in list_of_links: link=driver.find_element... link.click text=wat.until... textsave.write driver.back() x+=1 textsave.close() Is spitting out 30 of the same line (I'm...really failing at the code formatting here in comments, I'm sorry :/)
      – TRoch
      CommentedMar 10, 2014 at 21:01
    • I made a change to post. It shows how you can use a for-loop instead of that while-loop. You shouldn't use both, and in this case the for-loop is considered more "Pythonic". Also be sure you are calling link.click() (with parentheses) and not just link.click. The parentheses tell Python to call the function. Without the parentheses the expression evaluates to the function object itself.
      – unutbu
      CommentedMar 10, 2014 at 21:34

    Start asking to get answers

    Find the answer to your question by asking.

    Ask question

    Explore related questions

    See similar questions with these tags.