4

So I have a 2D array (named Data) that looks like:

 Shape 0 Shape 1 ... Shape N ------- ------- ------- Scale 0 | Value00 , Value01 ... Value0N | Scale 1 | Value10 , Value11 ... Value1N | . . . Scale N | ValueN0 , ValueN1 ... ValueNN | 

And I want to create a 3D plot where the ValueXXs are the Z axis. I've tried two attempts, but each give me a surface that is rotated with respect to the other one, so I've gotten myself a bit confused. Here is my 1st attempt at a solution:

x,y = numpy.mgrid[0:50:50j,0:50:50j] f = Data fig = plt.figure() ax = Axes3D(fig) ax.plot_surface(x,y,f,rstride=1,cstride=1) 

Here is my second attempt:

nx, ny = 50, 50 x = range(nx) y = range(ny) hf = plt.figure() ha = hf.add_subplot(111, projection='3d') X, Y = numpy.meshgrid(x, y) ha.plot_surface(X,Y,Data,rstride=1,cstride=1) 

Examining X and Y does no help really because its a square. I'm not sure when X represents my 'Scale' vs when it is representing my 'Shape'.

So, what is really going on with these two examples? Is there a better way to plot this array?

Thanks!

1
  • I find when I have such a case, it's usually easiest to deliberately generate a test dataset with different x and y axis sizes. This will enable you to inspect the plot, and in some cases (e.g. pcolor) it will throw an error if you get the x and y axis arrays wrong.
    – DaveP
    CommentedNov 5, 2012 at 8:02

1 Answer 1

1

If I understand you right, the confusion is which axis is which, right? If this is the case, you can easily plot a known asymmetric shape and the plot will tell you everything. For example, adopting an example from the gallery:

# By Armin Moser from mpl_toolkits.mplot3d import Axes3D import matplotlib import numpy as np from matplotlib import cm from matplotlib import pyplot as plt step = 0.04 maxval = 1.0 fig = plt.figure() ax = fig.add_subplot(111, projection='3d') # create supporting points in polar coordinates r = np.linspace(0,1.25,50) p = np.linspace(0,2*np.pi,50) R,P = np.meshgrid(r,p) # transform them to cartesian system X,Y = R*np.cos(P),R*np.sin(P) #Z = ((R**2 - 1)**2) Z = (X**2 + 0.2*Y**2 -1)**2 # <------- edit ax.plot_surface(X, Y, Z, rstride=1, cstride=1, cmap=cm.jet) #ax.set_zlim3d(0, 1) ax.set_xlabel(r'$\phi_\mathrm{real}$') ax.set_ylabel(r'$\phi_\mathrm{im}$') ax.set_zlabel(r'$V(\phi)$') plt.show() 
1
  • Well, basically I want to know the difference in behaviour of those two methods. I stared at the plot for a while and found one grid line that had a distinctive shape. By plotting it, I was able to distinguish what method 1 does. Basically, my method 1 literally plotted my array as I wanted it. The rows correspond to the X axis, and the columns correspond to the Y axis. If anyone could give a more detailed answer to both methods behaviour it would be a great help to me and others. Thanks!
    – The Dude
    CommentedNov 5, 2012 at 0:43

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.