Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

typodupeerror

CommentRe: You bet your ass it matters (Score 2)213

And the next pandemic is going to make COVID look like a summer vacation. Because it's not going to be a COVID variant it's going to be a bird flu variant and those are many times more lethal.

Let me add that if it happened now, as actual hostile activity from China, the USA would be defeated permanently.

CommentSeparate from the rebranding of covid.gov... (Score 5, Insightful)213

...an article worth considering from Princeton University's Zeynep Tufekci:

We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives

Since scientists began playing around with dangerous pathogens in laboratories, the world has experienced four or five pandemics, depending on how you count. One of them, the 1977 Russian flu, was almost certainly sparked by a research mishap. Some Western scientists quickly suspected the odd virus had resided in a lab freezer for a couple of decades, but they kept mostly quiet for fear of ruffling feathers.

Yet in 2020, when people started speculating that a laboratory accident might have been the spark that started the Covid-19 pandemic, they were treated like kooks and cranks. Many public health officials and prominent scientists dismissed the idea as a conspiracy theory, insisting that the virus had emerged from animals in a seafood market in Wuhan, China. And when a nonprofit called EcoHealth Alliance lost a grant because it was planning to conduct risky research into bat viruses with the Wuhan Institute of Virology â" research that, if conducted with lax safety standards, could have resulted in a dangerous pathogen leaking out into the world â" no fewer than 77 Nobel laureates and 31 scientific societies lined up to defend the organization.

So the Wuhan research was totally safe, and the pandemic was definitely caused by natural transmission â" it certainly seemed like consensus.

We have since learned, however, that to promote the appearance of consensus, some officials and scientists hid or understated crucial facts, misled at least one reporter, orchestrated campaigns of supposedly independent voices and even compared notes about how to hide their communications in order to keep the public from hearing the whole story. And as for that Wuhan laboratoryâ(TM)s research, the details that have since emerged show that safety precautions might have been terrifyingly lax.

Full article

CommentRe: Every disaster a climate disaster (Score 3, Interesting)126

This is the literal example of an admin telling the higher ups about a security issue, but which is ignored, until the security issue becomes a breach, at which point the higher ups will look around and ask why no one told them while they're spending five times the amount to mitigate the issue compared to them having addressed the issue.

I get your analogy, but I think there are many instances with climate change that are more akin to having your network compromised and causing more problems to others than to yourself.

CommentWrong problem, as usual (Score 1)190

As usual in this sort of thread, people start going on about the lack of babies. The demographic problem, the economy problem, the environment problems in the developed countries is the surplus of older people.

Start offering retirement as a lump sum at age 50, followed by a "died peacefully in their sleep" on a random date before age 52 and there won't be a shortage of babies any more.

CommentRe: What about the old i3 with Range Extender...? (Score 1)241

BMW makes a lot of motorcycle engines, so I guess they are still equipped to build hybrid drivetrains like that of the i3.

With battery density increasing, it could be possible to have that small displacement engine there idle most of the time just in case 100 or 200 miles of ev range are not enough.

CommentRe: Is the BBC even on Netflix? (Score 5, Interesting)129

I'm not in the UK, so I don't know

Among other things you don't know that the legislation here says that if you want ANY live TV, even a foreign channel via satellite, you must have a TV licence.

It's a bit shit, especially because they needed to call it a licence, suggesting that you're getting something directly in return. It would be right to call it a tax to support provision of specific tv, arts, radio and other media.

Slashdot Top Deals

The meat is rotten, but the booze is holding out. Computer translation of "The spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak."

Working...
close