CommentRe:Sigh. (Score 1)16
Sigh. Since eons, there is CamelCase and mountainCase. What on earth is snake case?
it_has_thin_bits_and_bulges
Sigh. Since eons, there is CamelCase and mountainCase. What on earth is snake case?
it_has_thin_bits_and_bulges
So what fresh new hell have they cooked up for my domain certs now?
... that they will no longer issue certificates for your domain to someone else? Sounds like a good thing, on the whole!
We are to believe it will automagically unfuck bad code. It is not to be taken seriously.
This is the correct answer. Having read most of the white paper, I'm left wondering whether this is an April Fool's joke released too soon. Some of my favourites:
TrapC is compatible with most C code
followed shortly afterwards by
TrapC compatibility when compiling C code is limited in a small way by the removal of ‘goto’ and ‘union’.
So that'll rule out probably 98% of real life C programs then!
also
how TrapC translation is implemented is a compiler implementation detail. Translations might be from a local dictionary, be captured ad hoc from user-provided input or be AI-generated across the Internet.
The paper claims that the standard unmodified C "Hello, world" program, if compiled with TrapC and run with LANG=fr_FR, will output "Bonjour le monde". With translation automatically provided by AI. I can see literally no way how that could end badly!
You only need two satellites and the surface of the earth.
No, that's not true. I'll try to explain why.
Each satellite transmits (very roughly) "My precise position is (here), and the time by my clock is (timestamp)". (In fact the satellites send a bit more - including each other's positions - but that needn't concern us here.)
With one satellite, this tells you nothing about your position: you know the timestamp the satellite thought it was when it sent its transmission, but you have no idea how long that transmission took to arrive. (Unless you already happen to have a pre-synchronised atomic clock, which most GPS receivers do not!)
With two satellites, you can compare the timestamps you receive - the difference in the times tells you that one of the satellites is closer to you than the other, and by how much. That's enough to narrow down your position to anywhere on a specific curved surface (a hyperboloid, as it happens),
Another, third, satellite then narrows the position down further - this time to anywhere on a specific curve. If you know you're on the surface of the Earth, that's usually enough to give your position - job done; if not, a fourth satellite will do the job.
But that's not the end of the story: while you know the positions of the satellites to rather high precision, the measurements of when you received the timestamps are approximate - for a variety of reasons, but including the fact that atmospheric conditions may change the propagation speed of the signal (and you have no way of knowing whether this has happened), and the fact that (since your receiver doesn't have an atomic clock) its local clock will drift slightly over time.
If all of the satellites you're tracking are close together, then the differences between the timestamps you measure from the different satellites will be small. But the absolute error in your measurement (due to local clock drift, atmospheric conditions etc) remains roughly the same - so the percentage imprecision in the differences becomes much larger - and so the uncertainty in your position increases accordingly. This is what is referred to as "bad geometry".
They allow a yubikey
What do you do if your Yubikey dies or is lost?
It's an important question. Sensible sites (and I think Google is included in this) allow you to register multiple Yubikeys (so you can keep one with you, and one in a secure place - or even more, depending on your level of paranoia). Other sites (Paypal, I'm looking at you - also Salesforce while we're at it) do not, and this is a big flaw.
Yes there are 3.5mm / lightning adapters. They're cheap and ubiquitous. I had one at my last job for the headphones they sent me during Covid that didn't have a Bluetooth option.
The ones that are cheap and ubiquitous aren't passthrough though - at least, not the ones I've seen - you want one that will give you a headphone output and another lightning socket, so that you can still charge / connect another accessory...
Why would they need to have an ID with them?
Err....to drive, you need to have your drivers license with you.
No, that's simply not true: I don't need to have my driver's licence with me to drive - there's no legal requirement to do so.
In the US, we drive....and slashdot being a US centric website, it's usually best to assume US if not specifically stated otherwise.
Sure, in general - but, if you read back up the thread, the context here is not "people in general": for some reason we're talking - specifically - about "most people I (psmears) know that pay for things with their phones". And those people do not need to have ID with them, even for driving.
>
What's your point? Nobody is going to ask what country you're from. It's irrelevant. The UK you don't. The US is varies. AUS you do for buses and trucks. So what?
The post you responded to was literally about the USA.
The post I responded to literally said "If this has not been the case, in your experience, someone else has fucked up.". I was simply pointing out that there is another explanation than "someone fucked up".
If it has nothing to do with you, nobody cares weirdo.
IDK, you clearly cared enough to reply!
Non-citizens are not required to carry ID, nor are drivers, and I've never needed ID to get medication.
I guess it must depend on the jurisdiction. Some require all noncitizens and drivers to carry ID on their person at all times. Some countries that had a methamphetamine use epidemic 20 years ago still have a law on the books requiring customers to show ID to buy pseudoephedrine in much the same way as they must for spray paint, tobacco, alcoholic beverages, or lottery tickets. (Search keyword: Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005)
Things are different in the US, but here in the UK I don't need ID for any of those things. Personally I do tend to carry my driver's licence (occasionally it comes in useful, and I generally carry a wallet anyway so it's nbd), but many people just don't carry any ID around. Indeed, there are people who don't have a passport and can't drive - and they may not even have any ID to carry! (Probably the most common reason for people to carry ID is to purchase alcohol, but once you get beyond a certain age (or at least look it!) that's not needed either...)
>
In the USA...it's never that simple.
Drivers are required to carry an ID if you are operating a motor vehicle that requires one. This includes a broad category of specialty vehicles and uses (eg Commercial), as well as specific regional requirements.
You also need an ID if you want to get on an airplane legally or if you want to get prescription medication because you need an ID to get a prescription anyway.
If this has not been the case, in your experience, someone else has fucked up.
... or I'm not in the USA?
I don't mind having a chunky wallet and a phone in my jeans pockets, but plenty of people do... especially if they're wearing a dress or skirt instead of jeans.
Places I've stuck a phone, wallet, or other items while wearing a skirt include a jacket pocket, an apron pocket, and a pouch on a belt.
And did that work for you? Great! But other people may prefer to do something differently, including the people I'm talking about.
Why would they need to have an ID with them?
Existing as a noncitizen, driving, or buying medication.
Non-citizens are not required to carry ID, nor are drivers, and I've never needed ID to get medication. So it's actually pretty common for people not to need to carry ID, including the people I'm talking about.
" And let's face it, if your cash/cards are lost/stolen, you are equally screwed."
It's not about theft, that is only one problem. Are you suggesting if you can't solve every problem, don't bother solving any?
No, I'm suggesting that some people feel that for them, carrying extra cards is—on balance—not likely to solve enough problems for them to be worth the extra inconvenience.
I mean, "let's face it", why bother paying for anything at all?
You're right! Some people don't carry any means of payment at all. Sounds pretty inconvenient to me, but, if it works for them *shrug*...
"For most people I know that do this, it's just one less thing to carry..."
Except it's not. "Most people you know that do this" need to discover wallets.
A wallet that's big enough to fit a smartphone in? My wallet's pretty chunky, but it won't fit my phone. But even if it did - I don't mind having a chunky wallet and a phone in my jeans pockets, but plenty of people do... especially if they're wearing a dress or skirt instead of jeans.
"...they'll have the phone with them anyway, so why carry cards/cash as well?"
In case they lose their phone or stops functioning?
Wallets can get lost too - and if you're suggesting they keep their phone in their wallet then they've still lost everything.
They need. to have an ID with them anyway, carrying cards/cash takes not extra effort because, you know, wallets.
Why would they need to have an ID with them?
It's almost as if you think that every app needs it's own phone, at least when it suits your narrative.
I have no idea what you're saying here. What is my narrative, other than "some people just find it more convenient to just carry a phone"? How does that relate to apps?
Because not everywhere accepts apple or google for payments and if you're phone is lost or stoken you're screwed. Also it means giving apple or google your bank details in the first place.
Well maybe - just maybe - for the people that do just carry the phone - all the places where they need to make payments do take payments by phone! And maybe (rightly or wrongly) those people don't have your misgivings about giving their credit card details to Apple/Google. And let's face it, if your cash/cards are lost/stolen, you are equally screwed.
You don't have to agree with their reasons. But they're fairly easy to understand, and there's no element of showing off (I'm not even sure how that would work - hey everyone, I'm doing this thing that loads of other people can also do!) involved.
"We live, in a very kooky time." -- Herb Blashtfalt