Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

typodupeerror

CommentRe:Are you ret4rded? (Score 1)213

And nothing of value will be lost when you go.

You're proving his point, you're an arsehole and carrying yourself like a cunt.

Basically you're living in a huge fantasy world where you're a perpetual victim despite suffering none of the prerequisite trauma... Because you think being a victim gives you special rights instead of a series of fucked up nightmares.

Ironically, you are everything wrong with modern western society. Selfish, arrogant and utterly engrossed in your victimhood fantasy.

The US is going up in flames but that's because of people like you and Trump. Europe is doing just fine and will be better off without you.

CommentRe:why not! (Score 1)55

Why would anyone care? If I like what I am listening to I don't give a shit whether it is human, AI, Robot or a gay fish. If they can effectively replace some of the radio jockey's with AI then great as lets face it they do fuck all anyway and it is not exactly a high skill job.

And radio host is infinitely more "high skill" than disk jockey... I mean how hard is it to press play on someone else's music... at least a radio host might need to talk.

Which is pretty much the last bastion of radio in most countries, definitely in Australia... talkback radio.. However I can see this being replaced by AI relatively shortly as the people who call into talk back radio tend not to be very bright and all the AI needs to do is regurgitate some nonsense about immigrants to keep them angry and afraid (occasionally interspersed with how bad young people are, the odd mention of druggies doesn't hurt either).

CommentRe:CADA station (Score 1)55

So it is music and someone who is ignored by all listeners occasionally reading the title of an odd song from the "stream"?

Small wonder nobody noticed.

It's a hip hop and R&B station, they don't play music either.

It does go to show that the quality of radio show hosts is pretty abysmal if they can be that easily replaced by AI... Then again, I don't think many people actually listen to the radio, it's mostly background noise to prevent people from being alone with their own thoughts.

CommentRe:There is no limit ... (Score 2)73

... to how far the idea of me ever installing this can fuck off.

Someone might, at this very moment, be building interstellar probes that could be launched into the aether to wander the stars for countless millennia to come, and which will drift past far distant planets that are still not far enough away for Perplexity and their data-grabbing appliances to fuck off to.

Their strategy will be to get it preinstalled or otherwise trick people into using it.

Things like this will force more and more countries to adopt European style GDPR laws. That is not a bad thing.

CommentRe:WFH works for some, not for others (Score 1)121

Unfortunately both sides in the debate don't want to acknowledge this simple fact.

If you're a gregarious type perhaps working in a role where personal contact matters such as marketing, sales etc and where the social to and fro is a Big Deal, then obviously working in an office is better than being at home.

If however you work in IT and you like to concentrate on a task without interrupted but at your own pace - so long as you meet deadlines - and arn't that fussed about being with other people then WFH will work for you.

Personally I'm somewhere in the middle - I'd hate to go back to the office 5 days a week but 1 or 2 days a week just to keep those social connections going with my colleagues suits me fine.

YMMV.

So... what you're saying is that if your job requires a lot of talking and not much doing you're better off in the office... If your job is productive than you're better off away from the former category.

CommentRe:Yes, this sucks, but... (Score 1)85

...it's kinda similar to a lot of pop music.
Pop music is not about creativity or talent, it's an artless, industrial product, created by teams of mercenaries for the sole purpose of making money.
They make it sound familiar and extremely similar to what's already popular, but just barely different enough to sound "new" and "fresh".
They are doing exactly what an AI does.

Yep, if the average listener can't tell the difference between AI and human generated content then music has already died.

Realistically it did in 1997 with the introduction of Autotune. No longer did you even need to sing to be able to be a pop star... now almost all of them are so auto-tuned you they literally cannot reproduce anything like what their recorded music sounds like. This is the holy grail for record companies as they literally get to own the sound and there is nothing the so-called "artist" can do about it... Well we don't call them artists any more, now days it's "performer".

CommentRe:In other news (Score 1)277

Careful, they'll deport you if you say mean things about daddy Trump!

Which is why I intend on giving the US a wide berth until it sorts it's shit out... deporting people without cause is the act of some shithole banana republic... sending them to a foreign prison without even a charge, let alone a day in court is North Korea level banana republic shit.

And yes, 35,000 ft is a wide berth. We let paedos closer to schools.

CommentRe:Something fundamentally wrong (Score 1)277

Over here in Europe the income from my investments is already filed to the IRS, likewise charities also report to the IRS which means that the vast majority can just say OK to the tax form sent from the IRS while a minority have to fill in additional information for deductions but then they only have to fill in that information so it is still much less hassle and work than it is in the US. The only reason this is done differently in the US is the TurboTax lobbyists.

The main reason the US tax code is so complex is that it provides cover for rich people to lower their effective taxes. A straightforward system like what the Europeans have makes ducking taxes harder. In the US, even the IRS doesn't really know if some complex deduction or tax shelter scheme is legitimate or not. That's the key motivation behind the spaghetti tax code. It all about maximizing the "gray" area of tax shelters.

Only rich people with their tax advisors can take advantage of the gray area, and since most poor people don't have tax liabilities, that effectively increases the tax burden on the middle class.

And making the US tax system even more opaque than it already is, is the first step in making you pay more tax without recourse.

Much of the UKs tax system is automated, it's good as it makes it simple to pay and to claim. However the system is still transperent. I can easily find out what I owe, what I've paid and determine if I've paid more, less or pretty much what I should.

This is simple because access to the tax system is essentially free.

By limiting access to the IRS, you're making it easier for the rich to avoid tax and the average person to be slugged more. Which is the plan in case you hadn't noticed (and I suspect at least 77 million did not).

CommentRe:Something fundamentally wrong (Score 1)277

Paper forms are free to the filer, but much more expensive for the IRS to process.

The free-filing IRS system was a win-win for the IRS and the taxpayer. But the Turbotax people probably paid better bribes.

It's not just the bribes... Sorry, the Trumpettes get really upset when you use that word and we can't dare upset their widdle feelings... Erm.. Gratuities in advance that got paid. This is part of Trump and the Republicans war on the lower and middle classes by making it harder to pay less tax. Trump wants to give huge tax breaks to all his rich friends but even he, on some level, knows that he cant do that unless he has some way to make up the deficit it causes. The easiest way is to find ways to make you, and every other average American pay more tax.

Removing simple ways to file taxes is the first step to making it harder for you to claim deductions or even, to know how much tax you've meant to have paid so that it can be more easily raised without being noticed.

This is what happens when you make "tax the rich" into dirty words. And for the avoidance of doubt... you're not what we mean when we say "rich"... not even if you earn, say, $174,0000 a year.

CommentRe: Global Treaty (Score 2)139

When the US wants to become a leader or a relevant player again, then Iâ(TM)m sure we can talk again.

When the US wants to become a leader or a relevant player again, they can get back to the rest of us a decade or so thereafter - provided that during that decade they demonstrate a commitment and an ability to be sufficiently stable and responsible.

Even if Trump loses his majority in the mid-terms, provided there ARE mid-terms; and even if he gets turfed out in the next election, provided there IS an election; it's going to take a very long time to re-establish trust in America as far as the rest of the world is concerned.

The literal imprisonment of the traitor-in-chief and his minions, followed by the instatement of a democracy more robust than the one just wrecked, might shave a bit off that time-frame.

Yep, the idea of America becoming leader again is pretty ludicrous. To borrow an Americanism, you've screwed that pooch, although most of the damage has been done in the last 2 months, it's really a culmination of the last 25 years of Republican fuck ups slowly diminishing US power and decreasing trust in the US. Americans, especially Republicans believed too much in American Exceptionalism, so much so that they couldn't see the harm in the rest of the world watching it fail and boy, has it failed.

When the US sorts it's shit out and decides it wants to rejoin the international community, you'll be partners at best, not leaders... And you'll only be partners if you limit the amount of damage Trump does in the mean time. For this, you really have no one to blame but yourselves.

That being said, Europeans have long memories... So if you can sort your shit out quickly enough with as little damage as you can, we'll remember that for a long time we were allies.

CommentRe:End of the seat back screen (Score 1)43

It was a very 2000s to 2010s feature that we've all seen whittle away with hosted video and that will continue. A big reason I can see airlines giving this for free is they can really eliminate the screens now which are probably a maintenance nightmare and planes have lifetimes of 20+ years.

Just give people a power socket and some of that internet and they'll be set, and I'm here for it.

Airframes have lifespans measured in decades, cabins tend to be measured in years. Most cabins are refitted about every 8 years or so, so IFEs tend to be designed to last that long.

Budget airlines have been getting rid of seat back screens for years because it saves a few pennies and a few grams. Less about maintenance as they're not an expensive item to maintain.

This is more about AA marketing than cost savings. They've already taken the seat back screens out of their narrowbodies although they're still offering free inflight entertainment via personal devices connected to the internal wifi (it's shit). Free internet is also likely only to be on domestic US flights as trans-ocean flights tend not to have sufficient coverage.

CommentRe: They already have it? (Score 1)43

You fucking people will bitch about ANYTHING!

You sound surprised by this. What's life like under that rock?

I suspect, in my cynical way, that this will just be an upsell... We'll give you "free" wifi that will be slow as dogshit in mid-December Scotland or you can pay a "low low price" to get a slightly faster version. Not like airlines don't have form for this.

Besides, I'm old and curmudgeony, why do people need internets on a flight? Use the time to disconnect and relax. Read a book, watch a movie, play a game if your seat has enough space.. Stare out the window or *gasp* how about exercising your imagination. I've come to the conclusion that most people don't have ADHD, it's just if they stopped talking, scrolling or otherwise keeping themselves distracted they'll hear their own thoughts and realise what a vapid and vacuous person they are.

A long flight is time I use to disconnect, catch up on a movie or TV series, the world will burn on it's own just fine without me for a few hours.

CommentRe:Targetted by DOGE? (Score 4, Insightful)127

The CVE system benefits everyone globally, and yet the US taxpayer is funding it alone? This is hardly fair, and makes it a prime target for DOGE. A system controlled solely by the US is also less likely to be trusted by some other countries.

It would be better with a global system, funded by multiple countries to spread the burden.

For years we've been hearing how other nations aren't trustworthy enough to have any power over the internet, control over DNS, et al... Now all of a sudden you want us to pay for it... Give us equal rights then ask for money.

If recent days have shown anything, it's that the US should not have control over anything more important than a teaspoon.

Slashdot Top Deals

/usr/news/gotcha

Working...
close