"This is explained by the visual cortex learning and rewiring itself to accommodate the changes in vision"

No.
It is quite adequately explained by the brain using existing pathways differently.

Thank you, for being the voice of reason.

Should we stop taking NYT and Slashdot seriously?

Seriously, MORE BULLSHIT ?!

Europe has a government and reports economic numbers.

If the US and China and California all count as "economies" then why does Europe not count? Southern China? Eastern US?

More bullshit from people who don't care any more.

No.
It did not rewire your brain
That is ridiculous pseudo-scientific nonsense.

Shame on you, and any editor, Slashdot and otherwise, who lets this bullshit through.

Equally, why would you need a Copilot key, a shiny Macbook, flared jeans ?

Fashion.

Yahoo also bought Altavista.

You haven't heard of Altavista ?

Exactly.

> I am genuinely curious where you see that going?

As the OP wrote, Intel will go the way of HP and start charging for reloading their CPUs with electrons when their built-in electron tank runs dry after 10 GFlops and Intel CPUS will be hardcoded to only accept Genuine Intel Electrons (TM)(R).

And everyone will rejoice when they inevitably go bankrupt and the managers who ruined the once great company are put up against the wall.

As I argued in my post above, trying to prove WFH is more productive is the wrong argument.

WFH may be less productive, but that does not mean an employer is wrong to allow it, because it means they keep staff who might not otherwise stay, and possibly for a lower wage.

On this topic, I think we usually argue the wrong case.

I work from home.
I value the chance to do that, and do it conscientiously, and work a bit more than paid hours to be sure I am being fair.
Even so, I am sure I am not quite as productive as if I was in the office, working the same hours.
*But that is a hit my employer is willing to accept.*
If they did not accept it, I would be more likely to look for work elsewhere.
So that is why they do accept it.

We upgraded the universe from 8 bit years ago, gramps.

"though quantum particles that are entangled appear to interact with each other instantaneously — no matter the distance and thus moving at the speed of light — modern science’s understanding of quantum mechanics interprets that it is impossible to transmit data using quantum entanglement."

https://thequantuminsider.com/2023/02/20/quantum-entanglement-communication/#:~:text=Even%20so%2C%20though%20quantum%20particles,transmit%20data%20using%20quantum%20entanglement.

Nah, he wants to keep everything solely between him, the Russians, his wife, his friends and his extended family.

I think the problem is that the boats need to be connected to the internet.

Their on-boat intranet topology is probably a less important problem.

And the difference is something that a technical writer and editor - who are proud of the work they do - should be aware of.