Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

typodupeerror

CommentSo short-sighted (Score 5, Insightful)44

I happen to be a Senior Director and I'm constantly pushing back on my VP about turning the screws on the return to work thing.

There are undoubtedly some tasks that are better done in person, but a "one-size-fits-all" approach is just stupid.

In my own case, I got a lot MORE done when I was remote, because I mostly used my saved commute time to work. I also got more family time.

I was fitter, happier, and more productive.

No we are making people upset and lowering productivity. Managing is hard, but managing by seeing who is sitting in their chair is awful. If you can't manage people on their objectives, then we have no business being a manager.

CommentRe:Sure... (Score 2)138

Her Board of directors was more like a Democrat political appointment group that knowledgable people guiding a tech heavy company.

This is totally disingenuous. There was a mix of Democrats and Republicans on the board along with a lot of CEOs who lean heavily conservative (even though they sometimes go along with performative progressive stuff if they think that is the way the wind is blowing).

Henry Kissinger, William Perry, Bill Frist, James Mattis, and Gary Roughhead? That's a Democrat political appointment group to you?

Some of her biggest investors were Rupert Murdoch, Betty De Vos, and Larry Ellison.

This was corruption and fraud. Not political.

CommentBroadcom doesn't care (Score 4, Insightful)57

Broadcom doesn't care. The revenue they lose from companies leaving will be more than offset than the revenue they squeeze out of companies that can't so easily leave.

Broadcom knows that VMware doesn't have much of a moat anymore so Hock has decided it is time to kill the Golden Goose.

It's brutal but it will likely maximize Broadcom's return on their purchase of VMware.

Clearly Hock buys into the maxim that the only thing that matters is increasing shareholder value. No other stakeholders matter.

CommentRe:Interesting idea (Score 3, Interesting)53

I got laid off from a mid-level position in a Fortune 500 company during the Great Financial Crisis (my whole team was cut).

I got a generous severance package (5 months) if I signed a document that said that I couldn't disparage the company or sue for wrongful termination.

Interesting, I was technically still employed by them while I was receiving my severance. So, I was getting my salary but couldn't get unemployment. If I got a new job it stopped.

When I finally found a new job (it was tough back then!) I had them put off the starting date to almost exactly 5 months of my layoff, so I didn't skip a beat (and I was technically never unemployed).

CommentRe:It's because they're replacing jobs (Score 2)49

You're assertion about unemployment doesn't agree with the facts. Look at the graphs of historical unemployment rate charts. It goes up and goes down and certainly doesn't support your claim that two world wars brought us back to "something resembling full employment".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unemployment_in_the_United_States

Slashdot Top Deals

1 Word = 1 Millipicture

Working...
close