Aren't we all?

In this case "consider" means that it's checking the probabilities against the training data and "makes sense" means that the phrase matches data it was trained on. Seems like you might not be considering how words have meanings that apply to different situations where they could make sense

If you ask for an explanation of a phrase then the AI model is going to give you an explanation for the phrase. If it's not one with an existing explanation, then you're basically asking it to consider what explanation would make sense for it and to come up with one.

What exactly is the issue here? If the questions were vetted by professionals and found to be appropriate, does it matter if it was an expert human or machine or cat walking across the keyboard that wrote them to begin with?

It's always astounding there are people on slashdot saying stuff like this. Guess it comes down to one or more of the following
1. They don't understand the technology - usually see people comparing LLMs to Markov generators and the like
2. They've never used the technology or seen demonstrations by third parties
3. They're unable to consider uses. Even if you can only imagine LLMs being bullshit generators, there's a huge demand for bullshit of different types.
4. They're afraid of the technology and don't want to admit it exists

CashApp does federal and state for free for almost everyone. That's using the mainstream definition of "free" as in you don't have to pay them any money for the service

Well at least we know on slashdot we're safe from that sort of watermarking

We should convict them both in that case, right?

So the republican solution is to eliminate the income tax because it's too easily defrauded (mostly by rich people due to underfunding the IRS) and replace it with a sales tax with exclusions for income? Well it's not the dumbest idea I've heard, but it's certainly up there. Guess the cuts to education are hitting the math skills of people on the right hard

If Trump were doing anything about the deficit then you might have a point, but he's suggesting increasing it through tax cuts and has implemented cuts to the IRS (meaning we're not even collecting all the money that's owed). Shows it's not a serious priority and I would expect to see the deficit skyrocket as the economy collapses

Whether people can smell/taste Cyanide is based on genetics (similar to Cilantro) so would depend heavily on the person. My dad worked in a lab with some cyanide components and my mom could tell instantly when she walked in the room if a bottle was open while I couldn't tell any difference

The bigger concern isn't so much people asking for "Cyanide Pizza" and getting a recipe, it's when someone asks for something benign and the AI generates a recipe that ends up dangerous and cheerfully tells you it'll be delicious

I don't think anyone is arguing that eliminating the department of education is bad because Trump is doing it, they're saying it's bad because it'll have a negative effect on education (especially in red states). The ED doesn't have a ton of control over schools anyways, it mostly manages and distributes funds and runs special programs.

The most TDS I've seen is MAGAs that believe Trump can do no wrong and anything he does is brilliant without any basis on reality.

At least if you watch Fox news all day. I guess it's not out of the question that Trump might watch Fox showing imagery of Russians killing people in Ukraine with a label "Live in Seattle" and order an invasion of Washington

Serious case of TDS here if you think the Mueller investigation was "a web of lies set up by the outgoing Obama administration." and Trump doesn't love Russia