Skip to main content

Questions tagged [unitarity]

In quantum mechanics, a unitary operator satisfies U<sup>†</sup> U = UU<sup>†</sup> = I, where † denotes Hermitean conjugation; such operators then specify Hilbert space automorphisms and preserve state norms, so then probability amplitudes and hence probabilities. Use for conservation of probability questions under unitary state transformations.

-1votes
1answer
116views

Lagrangian with a negative kinetic term

The Lagrangian density of a canonical scalar field is $$ L=-\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu\phi)(\partial^\mu\phi)-V(\phi) $$ if we use a $(−,+,+,+)$ sign convention. If the sign of the kinetic term is ...
hao123's user avatar
1vote
0answers
47views

Functional equation (6.156) in the book "QFT" by Lewis Ryder

I have 2 questions regarding Eq. $6.155$ to Eq. $6.156$ in Ryder's QFT book. In Eq. $6.155$, why do we multiply the functional $I[J]$ from the left of $\phi_{in}(x)$ and then from the right of $\phi_{...
syphracos's user avatar
2votes
2answers
212views

Generating entangled states with a unitary operator

I'm trying to find a unitary operator U to take an initial, unentangled tensor product state and generate an entangled state where each basis state of the first subsystem is uniquely correlated with ...
Dutonic's user avatar
1vote
0answers
56views

Topology and continuous families of unitary theories

Let $\mathcal{H}$ be an infinite-dimensional (separable) Hilbert space. In both physics and mathematics, we consider the unitary group $U(\mathcal{H})$, which consists of all unitary operators on $\...
d'Alembert's user avatar
0votes
1answer
40views

Charge number and current operators in Heisenberg picture

By proper definition of the unitary operator $\hat{U}$ we can have the time-evolution of an operator $\hat{Q}^H$ (superscript $H$ for Heisenberg picture; $\hat{Q}^H=\hat{U}^\dagger \hat{Q}\hat{U}$) as:...
H. Khani's user avatar
1vote
0answers
40views

Is there a structure preserving transformation in quantum mechanics, similar to Lorentz and canonical transformations?

I have noticed how similar the structure preserving property of Lorentz transformations and canonical transformations look, for them we have: $$\Lambda^Tg\Lambda=g, \quad D^TJD=J,$$ with $\Lambda$ ...
SasB's user avatar
0votes
2answers
106views

The meaning of $i$ in the Yang-Mills

In Yang mills theory (including maxwell's theory), the generators of $SU(n)$ are complex matrices acting on the spinor $\psi$. Now the phase of $\psi$ is also given by $e^{i\theta}$. Why do we use ...
bob's user avatar
  • 397
1vote
1answer
54views

Proving that a Hamiltonian transformation is canonical - Condensed Matter, Altland and Simons

In the book Condensed Matter Field Theory of Altland and Simons, page 63 eq 2.30 in the second edition, they are doing the following transformation for the Hamiltonian: $$\hat{H} \rightarrow \hat{H'} ...
Joe's user avatar
  • 543
0votes
1answer
67views

Connection between Real time evolution and Imaginary time evolution

Let $H = P$ be the Hamiltonian described by a Pauli operator $P$. The real time evolution according to H is $$e^{-iPt}.$$ While the imaginary time evolution is $$e^{-Pt}.$$ Consider the case $P=Y$. ...
Daniele Cuomo's user avatar
0votes
2answers
62views

Time evolution and anti-unitary operators

Let $\hat{H}$ be a system of lattice fermions with two internal states per site, so they can be described using operators $\hat{c}_{m,\alpha}$, with $m$ denoting the lattice site and $\alpha$ the ...
TopoLynch's user avatar
2votes
1answer
174views

Transformations on correlation functions

Let $\hat{U}$ be a unitary transformation that acts on fermionic fields (defined on a lattice) as $$\hat\psi_j \rightarrow \hat{U}\hat\psi_j\hat{U}^{-1},$$ $$\hat\psi_j^\dagger \rightarrow \hat{U}\hat\...
TopoLynch's user avatar
3votes
1answer
98views

Is there a no-cloning theorem for open quantum dynamics?

There are numerous papers that prove a no-cloning theorem (or more generally a no-broadcasting theorem) at various levels of generality. However, it is unclear to me if Cloning is proven to be ...
Silly Goose's user avatar
5votes
2answers
135views

Linkage of a classical canonical transformation to a quantum unitary transformation

Suppose I have an classical Hamiltonian $H(q, p)$ and the quantum equivalent $\hat{H}(\hat{q}, \hat{p})$. We can apply linear canonical transformation defined by a type-II generating function $S_2(q,p^...
drandran12's user avatar
0votes
0answers
47views

How to maximally entangle two qubits? [duplicate]

I'm looking for a transformation that entangles two qubits $\mid{\psi}_1\rangle = \alpha_1 {\mid}0\rangle + \beta_1 {\mid}1\rangle$ and $\mid{\psi}_2\rangle = \alpha_2 {\mid}0\rangle + \beta_2 {\mid}...
Tfovid's user avatar
  • 1,425
0votes
1answer
42views

What is the effective dimension of subspace when global unitary is restricted?

Consider any three-qubit state $\vert \psi \rangle \in \mathcal{H}^{\otimes 3}$, and let $U$ be a global unitary that can act on the whole state $\vert \psi \rangle$. Then, it is obvious that the &...
Pratham Hullamballi's user avatar

153050per page
close