Related changes
Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are shown in bold with a green bullet. See more at Help:Related changes.
List of abbreviations (help):
- D
- Edit made at Wikidata
- r
- Edit flagged by ORES
- N
- New page
- m
- Minor edit
- b
- Bot edit
- (±123)
- Page byte size change
- Temporarily watched page
28 April 2025
- diffhistWikipedia:Protection policy18:48−107Daniel Quinlantalkcontribs(location changed (see previous edit) and doesn't need to be mentioned in summary)
- diffhistWikipedia:Protection policy08:11−68Newslingertalkcontribs(→Logging and edit requests: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Pages recently put under extended-confirmed protection section has been removed in September 2024, per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive365#Revisiting § Pages recently put under extended-confirmed protection)
26 April 2025
- diffhistExample23:17+512601:1c2:4b00:3ba0:31fc:57bb:c382:4dc7talk(added a link)Tag: Visual edit
25 April 2025
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings18:23−940Chiswick Chaptalkcontribs(rv, we need to be much more specific than that; I think you must have just missed my message on your talk page, in your haste to redo your edit, which is called editwarring here on Wikipedia)Tag: Undo
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings18:20+940Brooksboy78talkcontribs(All of these sources are high-quality lists (from fantasy authors and academics) that show that the work is often considered one of the greatest fantasy works of all time. They all say the same thing. I can also, if necessary, paraphrase this information in the "Reception" section as well, and specifically bring up the reasons why these sources are high-quality.)Tags: UndoReverted
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings18:16−940Verbarsontalkcontribs(Spamming this article with generic cites, without any reference to what those documents actually say (or, in the case of books, what pages they say it on) is not going to improve the article or our understanding of the work of Tolkien. Please read the documents, extract what they have to say about LOTR, and then update this article.)Tags: Manual revertReverted
- diffhistmThe Lord of the Rings18:10+68Brooksboy78talkcontribs(added the original newspaper clipping, as well as the full archive for one source.)Tag: Reverted
- diffhistmThe Lord of the Rings17:38+6Brooksboy78talkcontribsTag: Reverted
- diffhistmThe Lord of the Rings17:31+117Brooksboy78talkcontribs(improving citations; i'm certain there are additional errors.)Tag: Reverted
- diffhistmThe Lord of the Rings16:50+1Brooksboy78talkcontribs(added a needed space)Tag: Reverted
- diffhistmThe Lord of the Rings16:43−5Brooksboy78talkcontribs(cosmetic change)Tag: Reverted
- diffhistmThe Lord of the Rings16:31+4Brooksboy78talkcontribsTag: Reverted
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings16:18+139Brooksboy78talkcontribs(TIME Magazine had a panel of leading fantasy authors to determine the greatest fantasy books of all time. These were: N.K. Jemisin, Neil Gaiman, Sabaa Tahir, Tomi Adeyemi, Diana Gabaldon, George R.R. Martin, Cassandra Clare and Marlon James.)Tag: Reverted
- diffhistmThe Lord of the Rings16:14+148Brooksboy78talkcontribs(another high-quality source. full list here: https://thegreatestbooks.org/lists/300)Tag: Reverted
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings16:09+277Brooksboy78talkcontribs(Science Fiction Book Club a seminal organization centered around sci-fi and fantasy. Good source.)Tag: Reverted
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings16:04+190Brooksboy78talkcontribs(adding in high-quality secondary sources to corroborate claim.)Tag: Reverted
- diffhistmThe Lord of the Rings15:38+3Brooksboy78talkcontribs(comma not necessary unless "it" it added.)Tag: Reverted
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings15:37−8Brooksboy78talkcontribs(not an opinion, literally any list out there of the greatest fantasy will have lotr on it. If you don't want to use thegreatestbooks.org by itself, that's fine. Look to all of the high-quality fantasy lists listed on that website. That's objectively far more than "one person's endeavor.")Tag: Reverted
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings08:26+637Chiswick Chaptalkcontribs(→Later: Unwin's assessment, ref)
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings07:40+5Chiswick Chaptalkcontribs(→top: small ce to make sentence work; this is well supported by the evidence)
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings07:35−111Scribolttalkcontribs(Claim of greatest not supported in article (and that source on it's own is not sufficient, a one person endeavour to rank books using an algorithm doesn't outweigh the RS content in the body)). Currently the reception at the time is summarised as "mixed" and the later reception is almost entirely focusing on minor negatives. It's influence is clearly detailed, and an argument could also be be made for "one of the most popular" using the existing article.)
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings06:27+8Chiswick Chaptalkcontribs(thanks, but this is an encyclopedia; we state the plain facts, even if you feel they are obvious.)Tag: Undo
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings03:49−8LoverofBooks101talkcontribs(Considering LotR is on the top 10 on thegreatestbooks.org, is there really even a need to specify with "fantasy"? "Crime and Punishment" cites the same website to show that it's one of the greatest books of all time, and it's even further down than LotR.)Tag: Reverted
24 April 2025
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings00:26−9Chiswick Chaptalkcontribs(rv, better as it was)Tags: UndoMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings00:16+949.224.110.194talkTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
22 April 2025
- diffhistThe Lord of the Rings07:45−183Chiswick Chaptalkcontribs(rv, you are continually making plot sections longer, which is unhelpful; Frodo is not actually Bilbo's nephew, either)Tag: Undo
