Timeline for Why was Tanenbaum wrong in the Tanenbaum-Torvalds debates?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2013 at 4:04 | comment | added | beatgammit | @vartec - Top500 link is broken. This seems similar: top500.org/statistics/list | |
| Dec 19, 2012 at 1:11 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by david | ||
| Mar 22, 2012 at 20:16 | comment | added | Andy | @FedericoCulloca Interesting... although that's probably misleading as well. Both rows count web servers only, one says it counts public web servers. I'd be curious to know even then if they accounted for things like web servers lying about what OS they were using. | |
| Mar 22, 2012 at 13:44 | comment | added | vartec | Top500: i.top500.org/stats, Google: lwn.net/Articles/357658, Amazon: news.cnet.com/2100-1001-275155.html, FB: http:/www.infoq.com/presentations/Facebook-Software-Stack | |
| Mar 22, 2012 at 13:22 | comment | added | quant_dev | Can you provide links to back up your statements? | |
| Mar 22, 2012 at 12:44 | comment | added | vartec | @quant_dev: 92% of Top500, 60-70% web servers, whole Google infrastructure, whole FB infrastructure, whole Amazon infrastructure... etc. | |
| Mar 22, 2012 at 11:43 | comment | added | Federico klez Culloca | vartec's numbers are probably exaggerated. I'll leave this here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OS_market_share#Servers | |
| Mar 22, 2012 at 10:51 | comment | added | quant_dev | "On server market Linux absolutely dominates with 70-90% of share depending on the segment." Where's proof for that? | |
| Mar 22, 2012 at 0:54 | history | edited | vartec | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 2 characters in body |
| Mar 22, 2012 at 0:46 | history | answered | vartec | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
