Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jul 14;11(7):e051224.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051224.

Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review

Affiliations
Review

Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review

Vaidehi Misra et al. BMJ Open..

Abstract

Objectives: Evaluate gender differences in authorship of COVID-19 articles in high-impact medical journals compared with other topics.

Design: Cross-sectional review.

Data sources: Medline database.

Eligibility criteria: Articles published from 1 January to 31 December 2020 in the seven leading general medical journals by impact factor. Article types included primary research, reviews, editorials and commentaries.

Data extraction: Key data elements were whether the study topic was related to COVID-19 and names of the principal and the senior authors. A hierarchical approach was used to determine the likely gender of authors. Logistic regression assessed the association of study characteristics, including COVID-19 status, with authors' likely gender; this was quantified using adjusted ORs (aORs).

Results: We included 2252 articles, of which 748 (33.2%) were COVID-19-related and 1504 (66.8%) covered other topics. A likely gender was determined for 2138 (94.9%) principal authors and 1890 (83.9%) senior authors. Men were significantly more likely to be both principal (1364 men; 63.8%) and senior (1332 men; 70.5%) authors. COVID-19-related articles were not associated with the odds of men being principal (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21; p=0.89) or senior authors (aOR 0.96; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.19; p=0.71) relative to other topics. Articles with men as senior authors were more likely to have men as principal authors (aOR 1.49; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.83; p<0.001). Men were more likely to author articles reporting original research and those with corresponding authors based outside the USA and Europe.

Conclusions: Women were substantially under-represented as authors among articles in leading medical journals; this was not significantly different for COVID-19-related articles. Study limitations include potential for misclassification bias due to the name-based analysis. Results suggest that barriers to women's authorship in high-impact journals during COVID-19 are not significantly larger than barriers that preceded the pandemic and that are likely to continue beyond it.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020186702.

Keywords: COVID-19; education & training (see medical education & training); journalism (see medical journalism); medical education & training; medical journalism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Principal authors’ likely genders identified among non-COVID-19 and COVID-19-related publications (submitted as separate file).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Senior authors’ likely genders identified among non-COVID-19-related and COVID-19-related publications (submitted as separate file).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Islam N, Sharp SJ, Chowell G, et al. . Physical distancing interventions and incidence of coronavirus disease 2019: natural experiment in 149 countries. BMJ 2020;370:370. 10.1136/bmj.m2743 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prem K, Liu Y, Russell TW, et al. . The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health 2020;5:e261–70. 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30073-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alon TM, Doepke M, Olmstead-Rumsey J. The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) - Working Paper Series; 2020. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26947/w26947.pdf
    1. Wenham C, Smith J, Morgan R. COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak. The Lancet 2020;395:846–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30526-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. King MM, Frederickson M. The pandemic penalty: the gendered effects of COVID-19 on scientific productivity. Socius 2020;7:23780231211006977.

Publication types

close