Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review
- PMID: 34261692
- PMCID: PMC8282422
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051224
Gender disparity between authors in leading medical journals during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional review
Abstract
Objectives: Evaluate gender differences in authorship of COVID-19 articles in high-impact medical journals compared with other topics.
Design: Cross-sectional review.
Data sources: Medline database.
Eligibility criteria: Articles published from 1 January to 31 December 2020 in the seven leading general medical journals by impact factor. Article types included primary research, reviews, editorials and commentaries.
Data extraction: Key data elements were whether the study topic was related to COVID-19 and names of the principal and the senior authors. A hierarchical approach was used to determine the likely gender of authors. Logistic regression assessed the association of study characteristics, including COVID-19 status, with authors' likely gender; this was quantified using adjusted ORs (aORs).
Results: We included 2252 articles, of which 748 (33.2%) were COVID-19-related and 1504 (66.8%) covered other topics. A likely gender was determined for 2138 (94.9%) principal authors and 1890 (83.9%) senior authors. Men were significantly more likely to be both principal (1364 men; 63.8%) and senior (1332 men; 70.5%) authors. COVID-19-related articles were not associated with the odds of men being principal (aOR 0.99; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.21; p=0.89) or senior authors (aOR 0.96; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.19; p=0.71) relative to other topics. Articles with men as senior authors were more likely to have men as principal authors (aOR 1.49; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.83; p<0.001). Men were more likely to author articles reporting original research and those with corresponding authors based outside the USA and Europe.
Conclusions: Women were substantially under-represented as authors among articles in leading medical journals; this was not significantly different for COVID-19-related articles. Study limitations include potential for misclassification bias due to the name-based analysis. Results suggest that barriers to women's authorship in high-impact journals during COVID-19 are not significantly larger than barriers that preceded the pandemic and that are likely to continue beyond it.
Prospero registration number: CRD42020186702.
Keywords: COVID-19; education & training (see medical education & training); journalism (see medical journalism); medical education & training; medical journalism.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
- Author Gender Inequality in Medical Imaging Journals and the COVID-19 Pandemic.Radiology. 2021 Jul;300(1):E301-E307. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204417. Epub 2021 Mar 16.Radiology. 2021.PMID: 33724061Free PMC article.
- Despite Growing Number of Women Surgeons, Authorship Gender Disparity in Orthopaedic Literature Persists Over 30 Years.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):1542-1552. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000849.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020.PMID: 31283733Free PMC article.
- Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Author Sex and Manuscript Acceptance Rates among Pulmonary and Critical Care Journals.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Feb;20(2):215-225. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202203-277OC.Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023.PMID: 35588358Free PMC article.
- Gender Differences in Publication Authorship During COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis of High-Impact Cardiology Journals.J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb;10(5):e019005. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019005. Epub 2021 Feb 23.J Am Heart Assoc. 2021.PMID: 33619980Free PMC article.Review.
- Characteristics of Heart Failure Trials Associated With Under-Representation of Women as Lead Authors.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Oct 27;76(17):1919-1930. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.062.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020.PMID: 33092727Free PMC article.Review.
Cited by
- Representation of Women Among Grand Rounds Speakers at an Academic Health System Early in the COVID-19 Pandemic.Cureus. 2023 Jun 29;15(6):e41150. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41150. eCollection 2023 Jun.Cureus. 2023.PMID: 37519558Free PMC article.
- Does diversity beget diversity? A scientometric analysis of over 150,000 studies and 49,000 authors published in high-impact medical journals between 2007 and 2022.medRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Mar 22:2024.03.21.24304695. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.21.24304695.medRxiv. 2024.Update in: BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 22;15(1):e086982. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086982.PMID: 38562711Free PMC article.Updated.Preprint.
- A bibliometric analysis of the gender gap in the authorship of leading medical journals.Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Dec 11;3(1):179. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00417-3.Commun Med (Lond). 2023.PMID: 38082119Free PMC article.
- Gender gap-Gender-specific development in the field of obstetrics and gynecology in Germany in the last 20 years.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Dec 7;10:1207388. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1207388. eCollection 2023.Front Med (Lausanne). 2023.PMID: 38155660Free PMC article.
- Gender differences and cooperation in medical authorships - an analysis of the recent ten years in five key medical disciplines.BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 27;23(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04041-6.BMC Med Educ. 2023.PMID: 36707803Free PMC article.
References
- Alon TM, Doepke M, Olmstead-Rumsey J. The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) - Working Paper Series; 2020. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w26947/w26947.pdf
- King MM, Frederickson M. The pandemic penalty: the gendered effects of COVID-19 on scientific productivity. Socius 2020;7:23780231211006977.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical