Gender Disparity in the Authorship of Biomedical Research Publications During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study
- PMID: 33735097
- PMCID: PMC8043146
- DOI: 10.2196/25379
Gender Disparity in the Authorship of Biomedical Research Publications During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study
Abstract
Background: Gender imbalances in academia have been evident historically and persist today. For the past 60 years, we have witnessed the increase of participation of women in biomedical disciplines, showing that the gender gap is shrinking. However, preliminary evidence suggests that women, including female researchers, are disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of unequal distribution of childcare, elderly care, and other kinds of domestic and emotional labor. Sudden lockdowns and abrupt shifts in daily routines have had disproportionate consequences on their productivity, which is reflected by a sudden drop in research output in biomedical research, consequently affecting the number of female authors of scientific publications.
Objective: The objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic has had a disproportionate adverse effect on the productivity of female researchers in the biomedical field in terms of authorship of scientific publications.
Methods: This is a retrospective observational bibliometric study. We investigated the proportion of male and female researchers who published scientific papers during the COVID-19 pandemic, using bibliometric data from biomedical preprint servers and selected Springer-Nature journals. We used the ordinary least squares regression model to estimate the expected proportions over time by correcting for temporal trends. We also used a set of statistical methods, such as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and regression discontinuity design, to test the validity of the results.
Results: A total of 78,950 papers from the bioRxiv and medRxiv repositories and from 62 selected Springer-Nature journals by 346,354 unique authors were analyzed. The acquired data set consisted of papers that were published between January 1, 2019, and August 2, 2020. The proportion of female first authors publishing in the biomedical field during the pandemic dropped by 9.1%, on average, across disciplines (expected arithmetic mean yest=0.39; observed arithmetic mean y=0.35; standard error of the estimate, Sest=0.007; standard error of the observation, σx=0.004). The impact was particularly pronounced for papers related to COVID-19 research, where the proportion of female scientists in the first author position dropped by 28% (yest=0.39; y=0.28; Sest=0.007; σx=0.007). When looking at the last authors, the proportion of women dropped by 7.9%, on average (yest=0.25; y=0.23; Sest=0.005; σx=0.003), while the proportion of women writing about COVID-19 as the last author decreased by 18.8% (yest=0.25; y=0.21; Sest=0.005; σx=0.007). Further, by geocoding authors' affiliations, we showed that the gender disparities became even more apparent when disaggregated by country, up to 35% in some cases.
Conclusions: Our findings document a decrease in the number of publications by female authors in the biomedical field during the global pandemic. This effect was particularly pronounced for papers related to COVID-19, indicating that women are producing fewer publications related to COVID-19 research. This sudden increase in the gender gap was persistent across the 10 countries with the highest number of researchers. These results should be used to inform the scientific community of this worrying trend in COVID-19 research and the disproportionate effect that the pandemic has had on female academics.
Keywords: COVID-19; gender disparities; research evaluation; science of science.
©Goran Muric, Kristina Lerman, Emilio Ferrara. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 12.04.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures




Similar articles
- RETRACTED: Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Jul;56(1):105949. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949. Epub 2020 Mar 20.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020.Retraction in: Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2025 Jan;65(1):107416. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2024.107416.PMID: 32205204Free PMC article.Retracted.Clinical Trial.
- Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022.PMID: 36394900Free PMC article.Review.
- Visitor Restrictions During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Increased Falls With Harm at a Canadian Hospital: An Exploratory Study.J Patient Saf. 2024 Sep 1;20(6):434-439. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001237. Epub 2024 Jun 26.J Patient Saf. 2024.PMID: 38917342
- Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(44):1-310. doi: 10.3310/ZUCE8371.Health Technol Assess. 2022.PMID: 36321689Free PMC article.
- Trends in Surgical and Nonsurgical Aesthetic Procedures: A 14-Year Analysis of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery-ISAPS.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Oct;48(20):4217-4227. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04260-2. Epub 2024 Aug 5.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024.PMID: 39103642Review.
Cited by
- Scientific authorship by gender: trends before and during a global pandemic.Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):348. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01365-4. Epub 2022 Oct 4.Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022.PMID: 36212912Free PMC article.
- Research on Health Disparities Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bibliometric Analysis.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 22;19(3):1220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031220.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022.PMID: 35162243Free PMC article.
- Towards equal representation - A bibliometric analysis of authorships in Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Chemistry from the United States, Canada, and Europe (2005-2022).Heliyon. 2024 May 16;10(10):e31411. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31411. eCollection 2024 May 30.Heliyon. 2024.PMID: 38826703Free PMC article.
- US COVID-19 clinical trial leadership gender disparities.Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Mar;5(3):e109-e111. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00017-1.Lancet Digit Health. 2023.PMID: 36828602Free PMC article.No abstract available.
- Gender Differences in National Institutes of Health Grant Submissions Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 Sep;31(9):1241-1245. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0182.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022.PMID: 36112424Free PMC article.
References
- Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, Agha M, Agha R. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:185–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32305533 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
- Atkeson A. What Will Be the Economic Impact of COVID-19 in the US? Rough Estimates of Disease Scenarios. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2020. Mar, [2020-06-27]. - DOI
- Alon T, Doepke M, Olmstead-Rumsey J, Tertilt M. Covid Economics, Vetted And Real-Time Papers. Issue 4. London, UK: CEPR Press; 2020. Apr 14, [2021-04-07]. The impact of COVID-19 on gender inequality. https://cepr.org/file/9014/download?token=S-8mCQli.
- Collins C, Landivar L, Ruppanner L, Scarborough WJ. COVID-19 and the gender gap in work hours. Gend Work Organ. 2020 Jul 02;:1. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12506. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32837019 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous