Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
. 2020;3(2):319-342.
doi: 10.1007/s42001-020-00089-2. Epub 2020 Nov 2.

Partisan public health: how does political ideology influence support for COVID-19 related misinformation?

Affiliations

Partisan public health: how does political ideology influence support for COVID-19 related misinformation?

Nicholas Francis Havey. J Comput Soc Sci.2020.

Abstract

This study analyzes over 4000 tweets related to six misinformation topics about the COVID-19 pandemic: the use of hydroxychloroquine as treatment, the use of bleach as a preventative measure, Bill Gates intentionally causing the virus, the Chinese Communist Party intentionally causing the virus, and the Deep State causing the virus to ruin the economy and threaten President Trump's reelection chances. Across 5 of 6 topics (excluding bleach), conservatives dominate the discourse on Twitter. Conservatives are also more likely than their liberal peers to believe in and push conspiracy theories that the Chinese Communist Party, Bill Gates, and the Deep State are working in conjunction to infect the population and enact a surveillance state. Pandemic related misinformation has previously been associated with decreased adherence to public health recommendations and adverse health effects and evidence from the current pandemic indicates that adherence to public health recommendations is starkly partisan. This study suggests that the political and informational polarization further facilitated by social media platforms such as Twitter may have dire consequences for public health.

Keywords: COVID-19; Political polarization; Sentiment analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interestNo relevant disclosures.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sentiment percentages by topic
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Tweet ideology percentages by topic
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Hydroxychloroquine Tweets
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Bleach Tweets
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
5G Tweets
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Bill Gates Tweets
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
CCPV Tweets
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Deep State Tweets

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nisbet EC, Cooper KE, Garrett RK. The partisan brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (dis) trust science. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2015;658(1):36–66. doi: 10.1177/0002716214555474. - DOI
    1. Ahmed, W., Vidal-Alaball, J., Downing, J., & Seguí, F.L. (2020). Dangerous messages or satire? analysing the conspiracy theory linking 5g to covid-19 through social network analysis. J. Med Internet Res. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shahsavari, S., Holur, P., Tangherlini, T. R., & Roychowdhury, V. (2020). Conspiracy in the time of Corona: Automatic detection of Covid-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news. arXiv preprint. arXiv:2004.13783. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chew C, Eysenbach G. Pandemics in the age of Twitter: content analysis of Tweets during the 2009 H1N1 outbreak. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11):e14118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014118. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Constantinou, M., Kagialis, A. & Karekla, M., (2020). Is science failing to pass its message to people? Reasons and risks behind conspiracy theories and myths regarding COVID-19. Reasons and risks behind conspiracy theories and myths regarding COVID-19 (April 16, 2020).

LinkOut - more resources

close