The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses
- PMID: 32564670
- DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1783340
The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses
Abstract
COVID-19 has created a ramifying public health, economic, and political crisis throughout many countries in the world. While globally the pandemic is at different stages and far from under control in some countries, now is the time for public health researchers and political scientists to start understanding how and why governments responded the way they have, explore how effective these responses appear to be, and what lessons we can draw about effective public health policymaking in preparation of the next wave of COVID-19 or the next infectious disease pandemic. We argue that there will be no way to understand the different responses to COVID-19 and their effects without understanding policy and politics. We propose four key focuses to understand the reasons for COVID-19 responses: social policies to crisis management as well as recovery, regime type (democracy or autocracy), formal political institutions (federalism, presidentialism), and state capacity (control over health care systems and public administration). A research agenda to address the COVID-19 pandemic that takes politics as a serious focus can enable the development of more realistic, sustainable interventions in policies and shape our broader understanding of the politics of public health.
Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; global health politics; government responses; health policy.
Similar articles
- The world expects effective global health interventions: Can global health deliver?Glob Public Health. 2020 Sep;15(9):1396-1403. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2020.1795222. Epub 2020 Jul 20.Glob Public Health. 2020.PMID: 32684125
- The Coronavirus Pandemic: Public Health and American Values.J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Jun;48(2):354-359. doi: 10.1177/1073110520935350.J Law Med Ethics. 2020.PMID: 32631194No abstract available.
- COVID-19 pandemic: Are we witnessing the first world war?Indian J Public Health. 2020 Apr-Jun;64(2):99-101. doi: 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_432_20.Indian J Public Health. 2020.PMID: 32584289No abstract available.
- Public health, pandemic response, and the 2020 US election.Lancet Public Health. 2020 Oct;5(10):e515-e516. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30206-1.Lancet Public Health. 2020.PMID: 33007205Free PMC article.Review.No abstract available.
- COVID-19 Science Policy, Experts, and Publics: Why Epistemic Democracy Matters in Ecological Crises.OMICS. 2020 Aug;24(8):479-482. doi: 10.1089/omi.2020.0083. Epub 2020 Jul 9.OMICS. 2020.PMID: 32644877Review.
Cited by
- Evaluation of China's public health system response to COVID-19.J Glob Health. 2021 Jan 16;11:05004. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.05004.J Glob Health. 2021.PMID: 33643637Free PMC article.
- Visual Preoperative Risk Depiction Tools for Shared Decision-making: A Pilot Study from the Surgeon's Perspective.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Nov 29;10(11):e4690. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004690. eCollection 2022 Nov.Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022.PMID: 36467117Free PMC article.
- Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis.Soc Policy Adm. 2021 Mar;55(2):249-260. doi: 10.1111/spol.12718. Epub 2021 Mar 16.Soc Policy Adm. 2021.PMID: 34230721Free PMC article.
- Highlight of potential impact of new viral genotypes of SARS-CoV-2 on vaccines and anti-viral therapeutics.Gene Rep. 2022 Mar;26:101537. doi: 10.1016/j.genrep.2022.101537. Epub 2022 Feb 2.Gene Rep. 2022.PMID: 35128175Free PMC article.
- Acceptability of government measures against COVID-19 pandemic in Senegal: A mixed methods study.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Apr 25;2(4):e0000041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000041. eCollection 2022.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022.PMID: 36962102Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical