Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keysNCBI HomepageMyNCBI HomepageMain ContentMain Navigation
. 2013 Jul 22;8(7):e66212.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212. Print 2013.

The role of gender in scholarly authorship

Jevin D West  1 , Jennifer Jacquet, Molly M King, Shelley J Correll, Carl T Bergstrom
Affiliations

The role of gender in scholarly authorship

Jevin D West et al. PLoS One..

Abstract

Gender disparities appear to be decreasing in academia according to a number of metrics, such as grant funding, hiring, acceptance at scholarly journals, and productivity, and it might be tempting to think that gender inequity will soon be a problem of the past. However, a large-scale analysis based on over eight million papers across the natural sciences, social sciences, and humanities reveals a number of understated and persistent ways in which gender inequities remain. For instance, even where raw publication counts seem to be equal between genders, close inspection reveals that, in certain fields, men predominate in the prestigious first and last author positions. Moreover, women are significantly underrepresented as authors of single-authored papers. Academics should be aware of the subtle ways that gender disparities can occur in scholarly authorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Authorships and gender composition in the JSTOR network dataset, by decade.
Shaded bars represent male authorships, unshaded bars represent female authorships. The black line indicates the fraction of authorships that are women, the red line indicates the fraction of first authorships that are women, and the blue line indicates the fraction of last authorships that are women.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Even in fields with a gender composition near parity, men (blue bars) and women (pink bars) are unequally distributed in subfields.
Shown here is sociology and its subfields from 1990 to the present. An interactive version of this graph, covering all fields and subfields of the JSTOR network dataset, is available online at http://www.eigenfactor.org/gender/.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Gender as a function of authorship order across the entire JSTOR network dataset.
Top panel: 888,060 authorships prior to 1990. Bottom panel: 1,156,354 authorships from 1990 to the present. From 1990 to present, women are no longer severely underrepresented as first author, but they are increasingly underrepresented as last author. Error bars indicate one standard deviation of the binomial distribution. For the graph of author position, the solid line indicates the overall frequency of women in the JSTOR network dataset. For the last-author graph, the point indicates the frequency of women who are last author on papers with at least three authors. The horizontal line in this part of the graph indicates the appropriate comparator: the overall frequency of women in any authorship position on papers with three or more authors.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Gender as a function of authorship position in three domains of scholarship from 1990 to present: cell and molecular biology (276,992 authorships), sociology (44,895 authorships), and mathematics (6,134 authorships).
In molecular biology, women are overrepresented as first author but underrepresented at the last author position. In sociology, women are underrepresented in both first and last author positions. In mathematics, where the convention is for alphabetical author order , women are neither under- nor over-represented at first or last author positions.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Distribution of author number over time for the JSTOR corpus.
Multi-authored papers have increased over time while the fraction of single-authored papers have declined. The y-axis is the percentage of papers with the given number of authors. The legend shows “A”, the number of authors on a paper.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

  • The Future of Women in Psychological Science.
    Gruber J, Mendle J, Lindquist KA, Schmader T, Clark LA, Bliss-Moreau E, Akinola M, Atlas L, Barch DM, Barrett LF, Borelli JL, Brannon TN, Bunge SA, Campos B, Cantlon J, Carter R, Carter-Sowell AR, Chen S, Craske MG, Cuddy AJC, Crum A, Davachi L, Duckworth AL, Dutra SJ, Eisenberger NI, Ferguson M, Ford BQ, Fredrickson BL, Goodman SH, Gopnik A, Greenaway VP, Harkness KL, Hebl M, Heller W, Hooley J, Jampol L, Johnson SL, Joormann J, Kinzler KD, Kober H, Kring AM, Paluck EL, Lombrozo T, Lourenco SF, McRae K, Monin JK, Moskowitz JT, Natsuaki MN, Oettingen G, Pfeifer JH, Prause N, Saxbe D, Smith PK, Spellman BA, Sturm V, Teachman BA, Thompson RJ, Weinstock LM, Williams LA.Gruber J, et al.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 May;16(3):483-516. doi: 10.1177/1745691620952789. Epub 2020 Sep 9.Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021.PMID: 32901575Free PMC article.
  • Women in evolution - highlighting the changing face of evolutionary biology.
    Wellenreuther M, Otto S.Wellenreuther M, et al.Evol Appl. 2015 Dec 19;9(1):3-16. doi: 10.1111/eva.12343. eCollection 2016 Jan.Evol Appl. 2015.PMID: 27087836Free PMC article.
  • Self-citation is the hallmark of productive authors, of any gender.
    Mishra S, Fegley BD, Diesner J, Torvik VI.Mishra S, et al.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 26;13(9):e0195773. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195773. eCollection 2018.PLoS One. 2018.PMID: 30256792Free PMC article.
  • Gender Differences in Research Productivity among Academic Psychiatrists in Canada.
    Chauvin S, Mulsant BH, Sockalingam S, Stergiopoulos V, Taylor VH, Vigod SN.Chauvin S, et al.Can J Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;64(6):415-422. doi: 10.1177/0706743718802798. Epub 2019 Jan 7.Can J Psychiatry. 2019.PMID: 30616409Free PMC article.
  • Network analysis of the social and demographic influences on name choice within the UK (1838-2016).
    Bush SJ, Powell-Smith A, Freeman TC.Bush SJ, et al.PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0205759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205759. eCollection 2018.PLoS One. 2018.PMID: 30379928Free PMC article.
See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. West MS, Curtis JW (2006) AAUP faculty gender equity indicators 2006. Technical report, American Association of University Professors.
    1. National Research Council (2010) Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty. National Academies Press.
    1. Moss-Racusin C, Dovidio J, Brescoll V, Graham M, Handelsman J (2012) Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 109: 16474–16479. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conley D, Stadmark J (2012) Gender matters: A call to commission more women writers. Nature 488: 590. - PubMed
    1. Waltman L (2012) An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship publishing. Journal of Informetrics 6: 700–711.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

close