- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
8268635: Corrupt oop in ClassLoaderData#4701
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
👋 Welcome back coleenp! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks Ioi. Sorry about the force push. The github actions were failing because my repo was out of date. |
@coleenp This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the
Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi Coleen,
Given the code in add_handle
this change seems appropriate. But in looking at the other code I did notice that this call to record_modified_oops
in ClassLoaderData::record_dependency
seems redundant:
> Handle dependency(Thread::current(), to); > add_handle(dependency); > // Added a potentially young gen oop to the ClassLoaderData > record_modified_oops(); >
And it did raise a question for me as to whether the code that checks (and potentially clears) _modified_oops can run concurrently with this code, as we set the flag before we actually do the addition in the other methods?
Thanks,
David
Hi, Coleen, Thank you for taking this issue. your code change looks good to me. IIUC, this PR covers the code path from thanks, |
Thanks David and Xin, thanks for noticing the clearly redundant record_modified_oops. It was left over from when dependency oops were not in the _handles area. |
Thanks @iklam for the review and help trying to write the test. |
Going to push as commit 3586a23.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
/backport jdk15u-dev |
@earthling-amzn Unknown command |
We worked on writing a test for this but weren't successful. Based on analysis by @stefank this missing call may have been the cause of the crash.
Tested with tier1-3.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4701/head:pull/4701
$ git checkout pull/4701
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/4701
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk pull/4701/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 4701
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 4701
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4701.diff