diffhistPerl13:48−2A Shortfall Of Gravitastalkcontribs(→Ports: "readme.txt" with no other information is the opposite of a citation, and may in fact be the most useless thing I've seen in ref tags in the history of wikipedia.)
diffhistRoman emperor16:59−382123.24.140.170talk(How can there be more than one last Roman emperor, whose reigns were separated by a thousand year? This is merely a double down take after centuries of Western pseudo-historical propaganda.)Tags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
diffhistThe Lord of the Rings18:23−940Chiswick Chaptalkcontribs(rv, we need to be much more specific than that; I think you must have just missed my message on your talk page, in your haste to redo your edit, which is called editwarring here on Wikipedia)Tag: Undo
diffhistThe Lord of the Rings18:20+940Brooksboy78talkcontribs(All of these sources are high-quality lists (from fantasy authors and academics) that show that the work is often considered one of the greatest fantasy works of all time. They all say the same thing. I can also, if necessary, paraphrase this information in the "Reception" section as well, and specifically bring up the reasons why these sources are high-quality.)Tags: UndoReverted
diffhistThe Lord of the Rings18:16−940Verbarsontalkcontribs(Spamming this article with generic cites, without any reference to what those documents actually say (or, in the case of books, what pages they say it on) is not going to improve the article or our understanding of the work of Tolkien. Please read the documents, extract what they have to say about LOTR, and then update this article.)Tags: Manual revertReverted
diffhistThe Lord of the Rings16:18+139Brooksboy78talkcontribs(TIME Magazine had a panel of leading fantasy authors to determine the greatest fantasy books of all time. These were: N.K. Jemisin, Neil Gaiman, Sabaa Tahir, Tomi Adeyemi, Diana Gabaldon, George R.R. Martin, Cassandra Clare and Marlon James.)Tag: Reverted
diffhistThe Lord of the Rings15:37−8Brooksboy78talkcontribs(not an opinion, literally any list out there of the greatest fantasy will have lotr on it. If you don't want to use thegreatestbooks.org by itself, that's fine. Look to all of the high-quality fantasy lists listed on that website. That's objectively far more than "one person's endeavor.")Tag: Reverted
diffhistThe Lord of the Rings07:35−111Scribolttalkcontribs(Claim of greatest not supported in article (and that source on it's own is not sufficient, a one person endeavour to rank books using an algorithm doesn't outweigh the RS content in the body)). Currently the reception at the time is summarised as "mixed" and the later reception is almost entirely focusing on minor negatives. It's influence is clearly detailed, and an argument could also be be made for "one of the most popular" using the existing article.)