diffhistThe Lord of the Rings18:23−940Chiswick Chaptalkcontribs(rv, we need to be much more specific than that; I think you must have just missed my message on your talk page, in your haste to redo your edit, which is called editwarring here on Wikipedia)Tag: Undo
diffhistThe Lord of the Rings18:20+940Brooksboy78talkcontribs(All of these sources are high-quality lists (from fantasy authors and academics) that show that the work is often considered one of the greatest fantasy works of all time. They all say the same thing. I can also, if necessary, paraphrase this information in the "Reception" section as well, and specifically bring up the reasons why these sources are high-quality.)Tags: UndoReverted
diffhistThe Lord of the Rings18:16−940Verbarsontalkcontribs(Spamming this article with generic cites, without any reference to what those documents actually say (or, in the case of books, what pages they say it on) is not going to improve the article or our understanding of the work of Tolkien. Please read the documents, extract what they have to say about LOTR, and then update this article.)Tags: Manual revertReverted